VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09/23/04 11:09:29am
Author: kgoebbert
Subject: Re: IVAN REBORN
In reply to: ldavison 's message, "Re: IVAN REBORN" on 09/23/04 7:01:22am

Yeah I think it is kinda shady to keep the same name. Especially since they issued a final statement on Ivan last week and considering the damage it has cause to immediately use it again is poor judgement. If it were the case that the entire vortex stayed together and they were to have tracked it the whole time, I guess it would have been ok, but if this is a smaller vortex that was spawned off of the remnants of Ivan and travelled around the high, by definition it should be a new tropic disturbence and not a continuation of an old one. Just my 2 cents.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.