Re: Lucky SO is not my subordinate -- ��Ͳ��O�P�i��¾�u�|�d��

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: Lucky SO is not my subordinate

Author:
Question Girl

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:04:24 06/28/05 Tue
In reply to: SC 's message, "Lucky SO is not my subordinate" on 08:39:47 06/28/05 Tue

his supervisor talking about the new
>assignment for almost half a year and over 10 times
>but no progress...
In what good reason can a normal supervisor allow his/her subordinate hold up an assignment for half a year with no progress?

>Pls visit another website
>http://www3.icered.com/icered/home/forum/threadList.jsp
>a?messageID=2166452?
>
>Act of HKPC Staff Union 5 replies
>
> Author Message
>
> 3/F staff Posted : Sun, 12 Jun 2005, 8:17:20 PM
>-------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> My god! I've never known the act of HKPC Staff Union
>untill it newsletter released & from my boss. What
>they are doing are shameful?
>
>I was invited by them to join the Union last year and
>I am lucky enough not join them. From my observation
>in these few months, those active members are full of
>themselves, negative, not focus on work and even late
>at work. They are only finding ways to damage Council.
>
>I'm lucky I have not joined at that time!!!
>
> Nobody Posted : Sun, 12 Jun 2005, 8:21:07 PM
>-------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> Your civil servant are definitely overpaid. If I was
>the boss, I would fire all the deadwood instead of
>letting them play around the policy. It definitely
>waste the money of our tax payer.
>
> Unit Head Posted : Sun, 12 Jun 2005, 9:41:42 PM
>-------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> What the Union now doing is unneccesary and hostile?
>It is dominated by a few problematic staff with poor
>attitude! You can see the Francis Lxx, quite a lot of
>staff lending money to him. Designers, they are used
>to complain supervisor to Council and the Government
>many years ago. Printing staff, they are famous of
>uncooperative attitude and my staff were so afraid of
>them and they made copies in their own copying machine.
>I think HKPC management is too kind and lenient to
>those rubbish. How do we run our unit and perform if
>those rubbish keep demaging Council's image and
>management.
>It's time to take some actions!!!
>
> OJLover Posted : Sun, 26 Jun 2005, 2:42:29 AM
>-------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> The union is full of trouble makers trying to save
>their ass hiding behind the veil of the union. You
>should set good role models to other staff instead of
>wasting your time campaigning for a crazy guy doing
>nothing but claiming sxx discrimation and
>insubordination.
>
> choice Posted : Sun, 26 Jun 2005, 4:01:28 PM
>-------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>We are at the cross road. One way leads to salvation
>while the other leads to the ruin of HKPC.
>
>A problematic staff had been ternminated. Our union is
>backing him. While it is usual for the staff union to
>back staff, I suggest that we do so wisely. Backing
>the wrong staff, one that is not worth backing, will
>only divert us from our course.
>
>The choice is ours to make. Please do so wisely.
>
> Really! Posted : Tue, 28 Jun 2005, 11:36:32 PM
>-------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> If you're his supervisor talking about the new
>assignment for almost half a year and over 10 times
>but no progress, actually, he is wasting the public
>money.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]