VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3456 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:21:40 11/08/05 Tue
Author: Matthew Villani
Subject: Re: Hello?
In reply to: Pete 's message, "Re: Hello?" on 20:52:16 11/08/05 Tue

>I'll just reply to both your posts here.
>
>Thank you. Seems like a nice, friendly place to
>converse.

I hope you enjoy your stay here.

>
>I'll have to disagree with you on the media being bent
>on slandering the white man. I'm guessing you feel
>that the media has a liberal slant. I would disagree
>with both points. I think the todays media is only
>bent on making money.

While it is true that they want to make money, the Media Lords and politicians realize that by lying to the people with liberal lies, they can wield the most power as opposed to a democracy. Look at how much power the Soviet dictators and their cronies had vs American presidents and congressmen.

>If they can make it by cantering
>to the liberal or the conservative then thats what
>they will do. The people who control the media don't
>care about slant one way or the other. If they could
>make more money by being non-biased they would. Since
>there are liberal and conservative sections of the
>population the different media outlets will lean
>closer to one of either extreme. Fox seems to me to
>have a conservative slant and CNN a liveral. Just my
>opinion.

Like I said, they want to both make money and hold power over people. The unscrupulus method (liberal lies to weaken the nation's people) is why I am so opposed to the media. I wouldn't call Fox conservative, it's neo-conservative, which is a branch of liberalism presented as an alternative, which isn't, really.

>
>Also I believe the majority of blacks and other
>minorities don't have it out for white people. They
>just want to get on with living. Just like most
>whites.

Although I don't think the vast majority hate White people, they do not like living around Whites. Very often around their own race they'll express displeasure about living around Whites.

>There are some blacks and some whites that
>still harbor anger towards the other race. I can't
>really think of any solid examples of blacks. Maybe
>Jesse Jackson, but he usually seems to keep his
>speeches low key. I think most people just want to
>make money and spend money.

I think just about all rappers hate Whites. Personally, I don't hate Blacks, and I know some good ones personally, but I've observed that a good many of them strongly dislike living around Whites.

>And also I really don't
>care about protecting white culture.

Why not? I think all races and cultures should be preserved.

>It's mostly Greek
>and Latin which in my opinion is not white, caucasian
>yes, but not white. Medditeranean. Also Christianinty
>isn't even a white religion. Its basically Judaism
>with Latin influences. There really aren't any solid
>examples of true white religions anymore. Norse gods
>and Druids? in England. Those were all overrun by a
>Middle Eastern religion. I guess what I'm saying is
>that much of European culture is/was Latin. I would
>concider the Latin people not to be white. When I
>think of whites I think of Nordic or Germanic peoples.

Is there any reason you don't think of southern Europeans and middle-easterners as White? There are some kinds of middle-easterners that I don't consider to be truly White, but I don't see how Medeterraneans could be construed as non-White, since there really is no racial mixture element.

>Sorry for the tangents. I've been doing a lot of
>thinking about race and ethnicity because I am doing a
>research paper on racial/ethnic minorities and whether
>the system in place is appropriate for who is defined
>as a minority and how these people and others should
>be treated.

I'll try to help you with whatever aspects you need help with. I'll ask some questions maybe that might get you thinking. Usually they define a "minority" as any ethnic group that can't get on its own two feet, but sometimes they throw in other groups, but with sinister intentions.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.