Re: New Orleans -- General Discussions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:03:30 11/11/05 Fri
Author: Truthfully
Subject: Re: New Orleans
In reply to: Matthew Villani 's message, "Re: New Orleans" on 20:29:31 11/10/05 Thu

>>I still don't think its black people. Its that culture
>>that many blacks happen to share. Some of that culture
>>is pretty bad like you were writing. There are many
>>blacks that live normal lives just like you and me and
>>don't waste their money on trash. They just work hard
>>every day to make a living. There are blacks and also
>>whites that could be called "ghetto trash" (I still
>>think they are good people) but there are also blacks
>>that are upstanding members of society. There is a
>>larger percentage of blacks that live like you were
>>talking about. I'm not ready to say its due to them
>>being black and lazy. I think we will eventually see
>>which one of us is right or wrong. I hope I am. But we
>>will see. You could be right, but I really don't think
>>so.
>
>I do recognize that there are both good and bad
>Blacks, however, I also recognize that wherever
>there's a critical mass of Blacks, the area resembles
>a ghetto.

For examples check out the inner parts of NY, Chicago, Camden, Atlanta, and the worst of all, Detroit. And on the West Coast complementing the ravages by jugle bunnies, we have the Mexicans in L.A. and Sacramento doing their "thang." It's true that whenever Blacks and evern Hispanics come to occupy an area, it turns into gangland.
So it IS Black people. The "culture" most of them happen to share was made up By them. Blacks are the ones ultimateresponsible for keeping themselves down and perpetuating the negative image of them.

>
>>Sure I didn't think you meant other races were less
>>human beings. I just wanted to emphasize that. I
>>really don't think there is anything wrong with mixing
>>races. You have a right to your opinion and I have a
>>right to mine. I'm not gonna trash your opinion just
>>because its different.
>
>Mixing races is wrong for several reasons. For one
>thing, it destroys the genetic uniqueness of a
>particular race. For another thing, the children are
>often confused and embrace one single racial identity.
>It's not only the case in places with solid races. In
>places like Mexico, the people often identify with
>being AmerIndian, yet sometimes they will identify
>with their White Spanish heritage.
>
>>
>>Thats one of the things that pisses me off is that
>>there are some black people with some whites that do
>>the equal rights stuff way to far. They take it to the
>>extremes. Like Martin Luther King vs Malcome X. King
>>in my opinion was mostly moderate though some of the
>>stuff he said I dont agree with. X was just way nuts.
>>
>
>Sadly though, things will never be equal, because the
>races biologically are not equal, and I don't think
>that the high achievers of any race should be given
>the short end of the stick in education to accomidate
>the slower learners (mainly Blacks), which is being
>done today.
>
>>There are many of those "equal rights" groups that now
>>just use Kings message as a tool to get what they want
>>even though its not really equality.
>
>King himself in his own writings admitted to communist
>sympathies. Personally I'm not a fan of King or other
>Black activists of the 50's/60's era. Actually, I
>think the whole "civil rights" movement was more of a
>"civil wrongs" movement. If you're curious as to why
>this is, feel free to ask.

"Civil Wrongs" I can name quite a few of those. Affirmative Black-tion, BET, ghetto rap culture, reverse racism, bullshit race quotas, All Black organizations whether it's in scholl or the workplace. Now if I petitoned for any sort of All White school union, White Entertainment Television, and elimination of race quotas to keep qulaified Whites from being continually screwed over by Affirmative Action, the following would happen to me:
A) I would be branded a "racist"
B) The NAACP, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Louis Farrakhan would be all over me faster than they can chew down fried chicken and watermelon
C) The bitchy PC media would have field days for weeks on end blasting me, launching smear campaigns, and completely distorting the stroy for what it originally was, ending reverse discrimination against Whites, and all non Blacks for that matter.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]