VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:28:43 11/13/05 Sun
Author: Truthfully
Subject: Re: New Orleans
In reply to: Pete 's message, "Re: New Orleans" on 13:05:18 11/13/05 Sun

>>>>Why not? Sure inter-ethnic mixing has been going on
>>>>for millennia, but even today, the trend for most
>>>>ethnic groups is STILL to stick to and marry one of
>>>>their own. It's certainly feasible because
>>>>preservation of ethnic bloodlines is still being
>done
>>>>uncousciously.
>>>
>>>I think before we can focus in sub-racial
>preservation
>>>in the old world we should focus on racial
>>>preservation. I'm not opposed to someone wanting to
>>>stick to their own ethnicity, however, I am opposed
>to
>>>the idea of breaking up White-on-White unions.
>>
>>I'm just of the opinion that ethncities should be
>>encouraged to stick to their own, or very similar
>>ethnicities should be encouraged to marry. I 've
>>already given examples why.
>>>
>>>>I disagree. If you read accounts from Julius Caesar
>>or
>>>>even Tacitus, they report Celts as being very
>>>>homogeneous, with their tall, ruddy, and muscular
>>>>statures. This also held true for the ancient
>>>>inhabitants of Germania, and we both know those
>>traits
>>>>are typical of your common Nord as well.
>>>
>>>There are small amounts of Atlanto-Med admixture,
>>>however it is, as I said, small. Most of the
>>>Atlanto-Meds are confined to the southern part of the
>>>British Isles.
>>>
>>>>Not all, but a significant majority are.
>>>>Your typical med is much shorter, has a smaller
>>>>skeletal structure, darker, and has that "greasy"
>>>>look.
>>>
>>>A lot of that has to do with the typical med diet. In
>>>the US, the average height of meds is taller than in
>>>the old world. But regardless, there are going to be
>>>some height differences between different subraces.
>>>Compare the Bantu to your average Negro for example.
>>
>>No, your typical Med is shorter than your average NW
>>Eropean because of genetics. Diet plays a small part
>>in height or bulk increase, but a lot of it is still
>>determined by biology.
>>>
>>>>An example of a true Med that could be related
>>>>to Nords would be the blonde haired, blue eyed
>>>>Northern Italians or Northern Spaniards.
>>>
>>>Actually, those are mixtures of Meds and Nords.
>>>However, those areas still have a strong Med
>presence,
>>>but not as strong as in the southern regions of those
>>>countries.
>>
>>True. Northern Italy was invaded by the Lombards, as
>>well as the Vandals, and Visigoths.
>>>
>>>>In fact, you
>>>>should do some reserach on the region of Caledonia
>in
>>>>Spain. You would think you're in Ireland if you went
>>>>there and saw the people - tall, pale skinned,
>>>>blue/green eyes, blonde/bropwn/red hair. The works.
>>>
>>>Will do.
>>>
>>>>So my point is, it really isn't all that un-feasible
>>>>to encourage ethnic preservation, it's still being
>>>>done. Yes I know it would be boring to just stick to
>>>>one particular ethnicity after a while and that's
>why
>>>>I would approve of Celtic types mixing with Germanic
>>>>types with Baltic/Slavonic types. Not only does
>>>>(phenotype play a role, but culture as well. NW
>>>>European peoples have a different culture than Meds
>>>
>>>That wasn't really that true a hundred years ago or
>>>so. The modern nordic culture really isn't White
>>>culture at all. Modern NW European culture is that
>>>"tolerance" bullshit. The best solution would be to
>>>return to a culture similar to the one before the Jew
>>>invasion and go from there, after kicking out the NW
>>>Somolians and Pakis.
>>
>>All that "tolerance" bullshit doesn't erase the trtuh
>>that NW Europeans still have a culture of their own,
>>and that it's significantly different from Med
>culture.
>>Even millenia ago, there were differences between
>>German and Celtic culture as opposed to Roman or Greek
>>culture.
>>The Nordic Vikings differed from all four even when it
>>came to culture.
>>>
>>>>(frankly I think a lot of Meds today just have big
>>>>mouths)and their ways of thinking are different.
>>>
>>>The same could be said of any ethnicity, really.
>Every
>>>type of ethnicity has its loudmouth boasters.
>>
>>Not so much as Mediterraneans. Having lived around
>>Italians in NY, I've got to say that they're just so
>>obsessed with themsleves that they look as though they
>>want to jerk off over it. If only the majority of Med
>>would actually have a look around and exercise common
>>sense, they'd know they aren't the only ones with
>>"culture".
>
>Yeah Italians do like to do that. I know.
>>>
>>>>It's best if people who share similar phenotypic,
>>>>cultural, and attitude traits come together.
>>>>Bloodlines are better preserved.
>>>>However, This isn't to say that different European
>>>>ethnics shouldn't mix at all. But I wouldn't
>>encourage
>>>>too much of it. The we wouldn't know who's who.
>>>
>>>Believe it or not, there are quite a few that share
>>>that view, however, although I agree partially with
>>>it, like I said, it shouldn't be to the extent that
>it
>>>breaks apart White-on-White relationships, and I
>think
>>>it can only be applied to the Old World.
>>>
>>>>I spend some time on Amren. Their views are pretty
>>>>similar to mine when it comes to sub-racial
>>>>preservation.
>>>>Let's face it, if we mixed ALL Whites together, it
>>>>would be really fucking boring. Think of it like
>>this:
>>>>"Hey what are you?" The reply: "Well let's see, I'm
>>>>Irish, German, Italian, Ukrainian, Russian,
>>>>Hungarian, Greek, Swedish, etc." That's NOT what I
>>>>want to see, and I know plenty of people who share
>my
>>>>views.
>>>
>>>Believe me, I'm NOT looking to establish some White
>>>superstate of mixing all Whites into one single
>>>ethnicity. However, in the US, the example you
>>>provided is pretty much true for a lot of American
>>>Whites. I just recognize that the situation in the
>new
>>>world and Australia is different from Europe, North
>>>Africa, and the Middle East.
>>>
>>>>I don't hate anyone who comes from multiple
>>>>backgrounds, I just want to see bloodlines preserved
>>>>and continue.
>>>
>>>That can be arranged in the old world once the jewish
>>>and NW problems are all solved and the gliberal
>>>establishments are crushed for all time.
>>
>>It's more than just rcial bloodlines that should be
>>preserved. Different ethnic bloodlines should be given
>>the same consideration. Everyone's unique and
>>different for a reason.
>>>
>>>>About what you said about the Celts, if only all the
>>>>Celts scattered across mainland Europe would come
>>>>together and unitw with Ireland, Scotland, and
>Wales,
>>>>they could have a sort of a re-birth of the power
>>they
>>>>enjoyed millennia ago. Just having them being
>>>>scattered all over doesn't sit well with me. I'd
>like
>>>>to see them together again, putting factional
>>>>differences aside, procreating, and thriving. After
>>>>all, the Celts did rule Europe for centuries before
>>>>the Romans came on the scene. Sadly, Celtic
>>infighting
>>>>did them in more than the Roman invasions did. But
>>>>that's another story for another time.
>>>
>>>I'd say what really needs to happen is that the Celts
>>>in Ireland need to kick out all of the Negroes and
>>>Pakis, and start having more kids per family, and
>then
>>>whatever problems there were would then be solved. I
>>>like the idea personally of a widespread Celtic
>>>presence. Despite my Italian surname, I have as much
>>>or more Irish than Italian blood in me, so I
>>>definately sympathize with matters concerning the
>>>Irish as well as Italian. I'm what you might call a
>>>Heinz 57 (I have 10 or more ethnicities).
>>
>>I would like to see the fighting over Northern Ireland
>>end.
>>My take is this, they're fighting over religion:
>>Catholicism vs. Protestantnism. Big Deal! If there was
>>some way I could convince them to forget about
>>religion and embrace their similarities, they're
>>Celts, they're fierce, they once ruled all of Europe,
>>the Anglos and turd world invaders are their real
>>enemies, and they need to break the vicious cycle of
>>Celtic against Celtic infighting that has cursed Celts
>>throughout history.
>
>I don't think the Angles and the Celts need to be
>enemies.

They don't need to be but they are. Have you ever read the atrocities the Anglos committed against Ireland? The attempts of genocide, rape, and brutalization committed by British overseers? They were all assholes, plain and simple.
And about the Irish Potato Famine, it wasn't just the potatoes dying off that killed and drove off so many Irish Celts, it was the Angles deliberately keeping food supplies from entering Irish ports that caused the greatest damage.
While Irish people (even small children) were dying, livestock, pork, dairy, and wheat were barred from entry into the Emerald Isle and shipped off elsewhere as surplus so that the English could have made some extra profits.
I'm not even going to go into the oppression the American Anglos heaped on the Irish, who were the first European immigrants to come here to great waves and were shit on the worst out of all.
You can't just say that Celts have to forget about everything and lose sight of a long time enemy.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.