Re: The Political Spectrum -- General Discussions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:14:32 09/21/05 Wed
Author: Adriana
Subject: Re: The Political Spectrum
In reply to: Matthew Villani 's message, "Re: The Political Spectrum" on 11:04:52 07/27/05 Wed

>>1) Some people want more equality, help those who are
>>at, or near, the bottom of the social scale without it
>>being their own doing. But this would cost a lot of
>>money, almost(?) something like a "bottomless pit".
>>Who will pay for that?
>
>Right now the government is throwing taxpayers' money
>into the aforementioned pit, and has been for the past
>40 years, while obviously these people, when handed
>free money, tend to spend it on flashy items, and not
>on bettering themselves.

Yes, and we all know what skin color these people have. ;-)

>
>>They say "the rich" will pay,
>>but "the rich" will just take their money and go
>>somewhere else where the taxes are lower. Who will be
>>stuck with the bills? The taxpayers who will, if in a
>>democracy, at the next election throw out of office
>>the current government.
>
>Generally the top 0.5% doesn't seem to be strongly
>affected to the extent that the middle class (those
>who make $30,000-$2,000,000 a year) are.
>

Sadly, that's true, the filthy rich will just go wherever to avoid living around blacks.

>>
>>2) Some other people blame the poor and disabled for
>>their own (mis?)fortune, because they don't want a job
>
>I'd say more often than not, it's true, about 75% of
>the time.

You're probably about accurate with that estimate.

>
>>(Truth: they can't get one because they are not
>>qualified for the available jobs).
>
>Not true, they're more than qualified in many cases
>for the jobs that the illegal aliens are hired or.
>

Yes, they should hire Americans instead of importing illegal Mexicans.

>>They resent the
>>large(?) deductions and heavy(?) taxes that are
>>(mis?)used for welfare and other goodies to pay the
>>many people who deserve no such handouts.
>
>In the past, there was no welfare state, because the
>families almost always cared for those who truly
>couldn't work, and those who could, were strongly
>encouraged to get a job of some sort.
>

And back then, black people actually worked and supported their families. No bitches and hoes and kill whitey shit out of their mouths.

>>Also
>>governments' other mis(?)handling of taxpayers' funds
>>are blamed for the much too high(?) taxation; even
>>graft and corruption, possibly sometimes leading to
>>scandals if the cover-ups don't work.
>
>Generally, these are to pay for government programs
>that are utter failures.
>

Which all are.

>>3) There many other views/schemes about what is the
>>"best" kind of government, but will it work in
>>practice?
>
>In practice, a small-to-medium sized central
>government that advocated traditional values and
>morality has been what's worked. Immorality doesn't
>work, as we've seen in ancient Greece and Rome, which
>both fell.
>

Yes, it destroyed both civilizations. At least they kept their original white population intact allowing them to rise again. Places like Egypt, India, and the Moorish empire mixed with blacks and never rose again.

>>4) Some don't want any government at all. Let chaos(?)
>>reign! Evewry person for him/herself, just as the
>>animals in the forest.
>
>These people usually are militant and believe in
>terrorism to achieve their goals.
>

Yes

>>Throw away the lessons of
>>centuries how best to deal with a lot of people with
>>so many different views.
>
>I would say as a general rule, the majority want a
>certain way in general.
>

Yes, the majority for example don't want all this pro-fag bullshit we keep seeing, but it's shoved in our faces all the time by the media.

>>5) Etc. etc. What is YOUR solution to the many
>>problems related to "The Political Spectrum"?
>
>My solution was mostly outlined through this post. I
>think the best move would be for the government to be
>small-to-medium in size. One of the bad moves of the
>past was institutionalized federal government run
>schools, because of that, we no longer focus on the
>arts, the sciences, math, literature, now those take a
>back seat to things like "tolerance, diversity, etc".
>Because of that we have to import people from Europe,
>Asia, and the Middle East who were well-trained in
>those fields. Schools should be run on an individual
>basis or by local governments. Other solutions are
>reducing the taxes, scrapping a lot of government
>programs, and to repeal any type of Orwellian law that
>has been passed over the last century.

Yes i totally agree with you. I fucken HATE that tolerance and diversity bullshit. I also hate that politically correct language. If i weren't so shy and passive in person, i'd tell these people where they can stick their touchy feely bullshit.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]