Re: 個人意見 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

May 15 2026, 23:30:04, Fri

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: Re: 個人意見

Author:
ml

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:24:34 03/26/06 Sun
In reply to: 隨捕睪 's message, "Re: 個人意見" on 22:49:14 03/25/06 Sat

各位看官，請看請楚這位有為舊生的論點論據，嘗試體會我的憤怒，也評評他有理還是無理！

一、這次他終於舉出了例子，說有兩位不稱職的老師，但卻又出了一位勤力學生，結果努力的還是考得特別好！那位生物科老師，相信不會是現在兩位中的任何一位吧！He was Bio Ho.probably has left

二、九成老師係「按章工作」，一成係廢o既，縱使係「過去式」，請問有幾多人認同先？如果一如佢所講，而以前d成績都咁好，即係佢認為所有成績係歸功於學生自學啦！in late 80s, most of the students were band 1 students, if teachers were not that irresponsible, they could have achieved more. Typical teachers: Bio Ho, mouse, Hong sir....

三、佢有講老師的不是，但無講過半句好老師o既條件！壞老師教三分一課程，我敢講我地而家九成或者全部老師會教晒所有課程；有老師廢嗡生字就算，試問以我地而家學校o既老師o黎計，真係話好廢o既老師絕對唔會多，甚至係無！就咁推斷，咁即係而家o既師資會比以前好啦，咁請問成績低落o既原因又何解呀？ One obvious reason, this is the consequence of a vicious cycle: poor school management >>> irresponsible teachers >> students had negatively-added value >> poor academic performance >> bad name >>> poor intake of students ....SFXC becomes a chinese medium school!!!! you all happy.

四、「ml」君，你夠膽o既就講o下你以前o既好老師有幾好，等我地知道o係你o既定義上面何謂好！「ml」，我可以好肯定話你聽，你寫o既o野越o黎越多漏洞，完全無晒說服力，組織同纙輯差到令人失望！唉…… My requirement is very low, those barely completed their duty were already good teachers to me. At the end of the days, this is only a job but I really despise those irresponsible teachers.

或者等我講清楚點解我會咁不滿「ml」o既言論：
原本佢關心學校成績低落，我都好認同，但佢提出o既建議就係叫校長整頓現在教師表現，更提議一定要鐵腕一點，甚至抄人先掂！
I never mentioned this

跟住，佢又不斷話佢唔知道學校現今情況，佢有提過一個好老師（就只有一個！），但佢點好呢？佢無講過。Miss Kwok led small group discussion ( 4-5 students) after school hours to discuss our Chinese composition, pinpointing our weakness. Every student had chance, no discrimination.

佢有提過兩位差老師，o個種差係極端差o個種，好難想像而家我地仲係俾o的咁差o既人教！接住落o黎佢舉出的事例，好似自打咀巴咁，真係好難接受！ The English teacher i mentioned has left. The biology teacher probably has also left.

唔該，求o下你，諗清楚，組織o下，係自己思想上出現問題，可以道歉，可以唔再上message，又或者俾番o的令人信服o既說話，作為成年人，作為有身分有地位o既校友，我真係覺得你好…好…唉，我講唔出口呀！唔該。I typed what I thought from my heart, and all i said was true. I did not mean to hurt anybody as the good one and also the poor ones have already left as far as i know.

>各位看官，請看請楚這位有為舊生的論點論據，嘗試體會我的?>垂耤A也評評他有理還是無理！
>
>一、這次他終於舉出了例子，說有兩位不稱職的老師，但卻又?>X了一位勤力學生，結果努力的還是考得特別好！那位耵型鴞?>師，相信不會是現在兩位中的任何一位吧！
>
>二、九成老師係「按章工作」，一成係廢o既，縱使係「過去式
>」，請問有幾多人認同先？如果一如佢所講，而以前d成績都咁
>好，即係佢認為所有成績係歸功於學生自學啦！
>
>三、佢有講老師的不是，但無講過半句好老師o既條件！壞老師
>教三分一課程，我敢講我地而家九成或者全部老師會教晒所有?>珛{；有老師廢嗡生字就算，試問以我地而家學校o既老師o黎計
>，真係話好廢o既老師絕對唔會多，甚至係無！就咁推斷，咁即
>係而家o既師資會比以前好啦，咁請問成績低落o既原因又何解?>r？
>
>四、「ml」君，你夠膽o既就講o下你以前o既好老師有幾好，等
>我地知道o係你o既定義上面何謂好！「ml」，我可以好肯定話?>A聽，你寫o既o野越o黎越多漏洞，完全無晒說服力，組織同纙?>霈t到令人失望！唉……
>
>或者等我講清楚點解我會咁不滿「ml」o既言論：
>原本佢關心學校成績低落，我都好認同，但佢提出o既建議就係
>叫校長整頓現在教師表現，更提議一定要鐵腕一點，甚至抄人?>𤂑i！跟住，佢又不斷話佢唔知道學校現今情況，佢有提過一個
>好老師（就只有一個！），但佢點好呢？佢無講過。佢有提過?>潀鴟t老師，o個種差係極端差o個種，好難想像而家我地仲係俾
>o的咁差o既人教！接住落o黎佢舉出的事例，好似自打咀巴咁，
>真係好難接受！
>
>唔該，求o下你，諗清楚，組織o下，係自己思想上出現問題，?>i以道歉，可以唔再上message，又或者俾番o的令人信服o既說?>隉A作為成年人，作為有身分有地位o既校友，我真係覺得你好?>K好…唉，我講唔出口呀！唔該。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject:

Re: 個人意見

Author:
隨捕睪
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:59:03 03/26/06 Sun

首先，我諗我真係要平心靜氣落o黎，其實我真係唔想嗌交咁，如果我有任何得罪，我先行道歉。I am sorry!

但「ml」師兄，你提及過o既有問題o既老師，已經全部離職及退休！我阿哥大我十五年，佢都係濟記仔，我同佢傾過老師o既問題，一比之下，我地而家o既老師已經算唔錯，起碼絕大部分已經乎合你o既最低要求，甚至比最低要求好好多，所以我覺得要提升成績，將問題單單指向教師係唔夠o架！

「ml」師兄，你手寫你心固然無問題，但係你未清楚學校情況，現今教師真正整體表現，學生本身學習態度，學生普遍家庭情況，教育改革，就叫校長要點要點，咁咪傷害o左修士同老師o羅！你係大人o黎o架，真係講o野要思前想後，要負責任o架！

成績倒退係事實，校長、老師責無旁貸也是事實，但尚有其他因素，看官可否也一同關注，一併討論，及作心實際建議可以嗎？