VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

May 15 2026, 23:29:52, FriLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6789 ]
Subject: Re: 個人意見


Author:
隨捕睪
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:33:34 03/26/06 Sun
In reply to: 2001 年畢業生 's message, "Re: 個人意見" on 23:39:39 03/25/06 Sat

敢問(但唔知你敢唔敢答):

一、請問「有心的教師」和「落力/勤力的教師」有無分別?如果有,你會覺得邊種好d,點解呢?

二、如果你以其中一位老師o既表現,踩晒全部人,咁樣公平嘛?仲有,我認同每位修士都有佢地o既教育熱誠,但請問你覺得Bosco年代o既教師,同現今o既教師,邊一代「有心」、「落力」同埋「勤力」o的呢?

三、最重要都係:點樣o既老師先至合你心意?單單講「有心」就得,我諗唔夠o卦!?如果「有心」,但無料,又或者控制唔到秩序,你咪又話唔好!唔好講到真係要求得咁單純啦!你認為差o既老師講o左一個,接住就話好o既就走o左,講到好似聖芳濟真係淨係得番o的無用o既人咁!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 個人意見


Author:
ml
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:53:01 03/26/06 Sun

敢問(但唔知你敢唔敢答):

一、請問「有心的教師」和「落力/勤力的教師」有無分別?如果有,你會覺得邊種好d,點解呢?

Either one is acceptable. At least they have tried their best.


二、如果你以其中一位老師o既表現,踩晒全部人,咁樣公平嘛?仲有,我認同每位修士都有佢地o既教育熱誠,但請問你覺得Bosco年代o既教師,同現今o既教師,邊一代「有心」、「落力」同埋「勤力」o的呢? I only mentioned there were some bad sheep. There were more good teachers.

三、最重要都係:點樣o既老師先至合你心意?單單講「有心」就得,我諗唔夠o卦!?如果「有心」,但無料,又或者控制唔到秩序,你咪又話唔好!唔好講到真係要求得咁單純啦!你認為差o既老師講o左一個,接住就話好o既就走o左,講到好似聖芳濟真係淨係得番o的無用o既人咁!


There are no 無料 teachers, as far as there are recruited, they are qualified. I think what is more important is their attitude. And students should be humble, no matter how bright you are, you are not as knowledgeable as a teacher; no matter how 無料they are, they are more knowlegeagle than you.

Thank you for your attention.






>敢問(但唔知你敢唔敢答):
>
>一、請問「有心的教師」和「落力/勤力的教師」有無分別?如
>果有,你會覺得邊種好d,點解呢?
>
>二、如果你以其中一位老師o既表現,踩晒全部人,咁樣公平嘛
>?仲有,我認同每位修士都有佢地o既教育熱誠,但請問你覺得
>Bosco年代o既教師,同現今o既教師,邊一代「有心」、「落力
>」同埋「勤力」o的呢?
>
>三、最重要都係:點樣o既老師先至合你心意?單單講「有心」
>就得,我諗唔夠o卦!?如果「有心」,但無料,又或者控制唔
>到秩序,你咪又話唔好!唔好講到真係要求得咁單純啦!你認?>乾to既老師講o左一個,接住就話好o既就走o左,講到好似聖芳
>濟真係淨係得番o的無用o既人咁!
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 個人意見


Author:
隨捕睪
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:03:22 03/26/06 Sun

嘻嘻!多謝你回答,但其實我係想「2001 年畢業生」答o既。

我問佢o既o野都係對應番佢o既留言。

Anyway, thank you.
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 個人意見


Author:
2001 年畢業生
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 03:17:22 03/26/06 Sun

1. 勤力只係有心既表現。
2. 我用 Brother Bosco 例子係因為佢真係教過我,如果你覺得
現在有其他濟記教師有心,你大可不必回應我。
3. 我想你明白世上無完美既好老師,就算合我心意,都未必
合你心意,如果你硬要說好老師的特質跟本多餘。你讀左咁耐
書,見過咁多老師,你覺得有咩老師令你有深刻既好印象 ?
有料,控制到秩序,定係以永不放棄既態度教學生? 頭一樣,
頭二樣定要晒,或者仲有其他? 你自己都唔知。 但我可以告
訴你,我有深刻印象既 Brother Bosco, 公仔佬同李劍雄都
走晒,只係剩低大頭黃,呢 d 老師令我係知識同品格都有良
好而又深遠既影響,咁你明未?


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.