Re: 致"徐步高" -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

May 15 2026, 23:29:38, Fri

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject:

Re: 致"徐步高"

Author:
酸名羊

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:35:56 03/26/06 Sun
In reply to: 手非長 's message, "Re: 致"徐步高"" on 10:41:13 03/26/06 Sun

咁又唔係咁講喎！

一、提出問題，當然可以唔俾解決方案啦！但呢個唔係「邏輯」問題，我諗你用錯詞語。但我相信如果真係為學校好，俾o的意見亦無妨。

二、就用番你個酒樓比喻，咁「ml」呢位食客o既意思就係以前o係「酒樓」食過o野，覺得o的侍應/廚師唔掂，但生意額仍不俗。事隔幾年，生意額下降，其實差o既屬下好多都走o左，但好耐無去過酒樓o既食客就話新老細要管o下o的下屬，完全無考慮過其他因素。當然，淨係提出問題，唔俾解決方業絕對可以，只不過係一個高質評論者，同平庸/唔成熟者o既分別。

不過，你o既睇法同作風不嬲都係咁，支持「齋鬧無罪」，只從主觀角度看事物，聽從單一訊息來源，深信不疑！以前係咁，而家係咁，完全無變！

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: Re: 致"徐步高"

Author:
手非長
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:07:49 03/26/06 Sun

我只係認為如果能夠理性和諧地去討論，才會引起更多歷屆師兄支持，發表更多偉論，這些都是濟記需要的。ml師兄的負面感受雖然令我們「濟記仔」覺得遺憾，但我認為ml師兄都係想給學校管理層一服「改革推動劑」。
另一方面，我真係覺得每個上0黎講野的「濟記仔」都無罪，因為我覺得佢地都係「有心人」，包括我和你在內。
最後，我覺得各位師兄在濟記求學路程中成功和失敗的經歷都是師弟們的明燈，也是學校改進的一份力量，懇請繼續多多回想，多多發表，一定有人會珍而重之的。