Author:
raymond
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 23:13:45 03/26/06 Sun
i would like to do a clarification, i just mentioned the teachers said the form one students in skul year 2001-2002
is the best in the past 1 decade but not 5
2001>2000>1999>1998>1997>1995>1994>1993>1992>1991 ten solid years
also, as the teachers said,we were the best new students in the past one decade, that means there were former xaverians better than us in terms of academic result or even moral fiber. i bet those xaverians are those who scored over 200As in CE in 1986 and 1988 as ml mentioned.
i were not claiming my cls is the best or sth like that. i just want to tell ml, what does a current xaverian think?
skul provided us the best stuff, but it doesnt mean we did cherish them. see wt i mean? blaming the skul is not the way to solve the problem but yrself(i m not talking about u,ml, i meant the current xaverians who are reading this, including myself).
if we wanna boost up the academic result in public exam, turning SFXC into a "tutorial skul-like" skul is certainly feasible and it s wt other famous skuls are doing. However, i do think that s not the Marist Brothers want
last but not least, thz for yr comment on my english proficiency and it s not really okay in my perspective, i would say.
>first of all, i would say i dont mean to be offensive
>to "ml"but i have to point out the current situation
>in hong kong, the secondary skul's circle
>
>as a matter of fact, most of the band one skuls in
>hong kong are having depression on their student's
>quality, as well as the academic result, but not only
>SFXC.
>
>>>>>> Dont seek supporting evidence from failing
>school, why not have a look at those successful school.
>
>
>however, have anyone of us ever thought about wt is
>the freaking reason behind?
>when i was in form 1, teachers always remind us we
>were the best form 1 student in term of academic
>result over the past 1 decade and they kept on
>reminding us this FACT throughout our skul life until
>now. when i was in form 3, mr iu said the top 20
>students in the form that year can score distinctions
>in ce for at least a number of 4. let's do some simple
>calculation, according to his prediction, 20X4, we can
>get at least 80As in CE
>
>>>>> in 1986 over 200A in CE
>>>>> in 1988 over 200A in CE
>Make sure your year can score a greater number than
>above before claiming your class to be the best in the
>past five decades, I am waiting for good news.
>
>and brother anthony(the current principal, just in
>case u dunno him) indicated that the current 5E cls
>could score at least 100As in CE
>
>wt does that mean?
>
>it means they are confident in us ad they have
>provided us the best teachers of different subjects in
>sfxc throughout the 5 year's skul time(in my
>perspective and 321 troop us excluded)
>
>however, wt did we, the students, do?
>
>i should better pick myself as an example
>my form ranking decreased by 40 throughout the 5years'
>time. i dont blame the teachers but myself as i do
>know the teachers teaching me are already the best
>that sfxc can offer. the main reason for the
>decreasing in ranking is all the matter of laziness.
>
>i dunno whether my other fellows got poor result becoz
>of this or wtever. wt i want to emphasis is that,
>there are nth to deal with the teachers and skul
>authority but ourselves
>
>just bring u an example, in dgs, the skul trains the
>students to get As in ce or AL from the very beginning
>in form 1
>how about in sfxc? we are trained with 自動自覺,
>自我尊重,自我控制 in form 1 but not 洗腦奪A
>
>
>does ml want all the current and future xaverians to
>be trained with "洗腦奪A" and leave our traditions
>somewhere unknown in order to achieve more?
>
>
>Everyhing is feasable but not everything is beneficial
>think about it
>
>
>>>>>> good academic results and good personally are
>not mutually exclusive.
>>>>>> one final word, your English is quite ok, keep
>working hard.
>
>
>
>>first of all, i would say i dont mean to be offensive
>>to "ml"but i have to point out the current situation
>>in hong kong, the secondary skul's circle
>>
>>as a matter of fact, most of the band one skuls in
>>hong kong are having depression on their student's
>>quality, as well as the academic result, but not only
>>SFXC.
>>
>>however, have anyone of us ever thought about wt is
>>the freaking reason behind?
>>when i was in form 1, teachers always remind us we
>>were the best form 1 student in term of academic
>>result over the past 1 decade and they kept on
>>reminding us this FACT throughout our skul life until
>>now. when i was in form 3, mr iu said the top 20
>>students in the form that year can score distinctions
>>in ce for at least a number of 4. let's do some simple
>>calculation, according to his prediction, 20X4, we can
>>get at least 80As in CE
>>
>>and brother anthony(the current principal, just in
>>case u dunno him) indicated that the current 5E cls
>>could score at least 100As in CE
>>
>>wt does that mean?
>>
>>it means they are confident in us ad they have
>>provided us the best teachers of different subjects in
>>sfxc throughout the 5 year's skul time(in my
>>perspective and 321 troop us excluded)
>>
>>however, wt did we, the students, do?
>>
>>i should better pick myself as an example
>>my form ranking decreased by 40 throughout the 5years'
>>time. i dont blame the teachers but myself as i do
>>know the teachers teaching me are already the best
>>that sfxc can offer. the main reason for the
>>decreasing in ranking is all the matter of laziness.
>>
>>i dunno whether my other fellows got poor result becoz
>>of this or wtever. wt i want to emphasis is that,
>>there are nth to deal with the teachers and skul
>>authority but ourselves
>>
>>just bring u an example, in dgs, the skul trains the
>>students to get As in ce or AL from the very beginning
>>in form 1
>>how about in sfxc? we are trained with 自動自覺,
>>自我尊重,自我控制 in form 1 but not 洗腦奪A
>>
>>
>>does ml want all the current and future xaverians to
>>be trained with "洗腦奪A" and leave our traditions
>>somewhere unknown in order to achieve more?
>>
>>
>>Everyhing is feasable but not everything is beneficial
>>think about it
|
Feedback: 