| Subject: Re: Old boy feels very disappointed<there are nth to deal with the teachers and the school authority |
Author:
ml
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 19:36:57 03/26/06 Sun
In reply to:
ml
's message, "Re: Old boy feels very disappointed<there are nth to deal with the teachers and the school authority" on 19:35:36 03/26/06 Sun
>first of all, i would say i dont mean to be offensive
>to "ml"but i have to point out the current situation
>in hong kong, the secondary skul's circle
>
>as a matter of fact, most of the band one skuls in
>hong kong are having depression on their student's
>quality, as well as the academic result, but not only
>SFXC.
>
>>>>>> Dont seek supporting evidence from failing
>school, why not have a look at those successful school.
>
>
>however, have anyone of us ever thought about wt is
>the freaking reason behind?
>when i was in form 1, teachers always remind us we
>were the best form 1 student in term of academic
>result over the past 1 decade and they kept on
>reminding us this FACT throughout our skul life until
>now. when i was in form 3, mr iu said the top 20
>students in the form that year can score distinctions
>in ce for at least a number of 4. let's do some simple
>calculation, according to his prediction, 20X4, we can
>get at least 80As in CE
>
>>>>> in 1986 over 200A in CE
>>>>> in 1988 over 200A in CE
>Make sure your year can score a greater number than
>above before claiming your class to be the best in the
>past five decades, I am waiting for good news.
>
>and brother anthony(the current principal, just in
>case u dunno him) indicated that the current 5E cls
>could score at least 100As in CE
>
>wt does that mean?
>
>it means they are confident in us ad they have
>provided us the best teachers of different subjects in
>sfxc throughout the 5 year's skul time(in my
>perspective and 321 troop us excluded)
>
>however, wt did we, the students, do?
>
>i should better pick myself as an example
>my form ranking decreased by 40 throughout the 5years'
>time. i dont blame the teachers but myself as i do
>know the teachers teaching me are already the best
>that sfxc can offer. the main reason for the
>decreasing in ranking is all the matter of laziness.
>
>i dunno whether my other fellows got poor result becoz
>of this or wtever. wt i want to emphasis is that,
>there are nth to deal with the teachers and skul
>authority but ourselves
>
>just bring u an example, in dgs, the skul trains the
>students to get As in ce or AL from the very beginning
>in form 1
>how about in sfxc? we are trained with 自動自覺,
>自我尊重,自我控制 in form 1 but not 洗腦奪A
>
>
>does ml want all the current and future xaverians to
>be trained with "洗腦奪A" and leave our traditions
>somewhere unknown in order to achieve more?
>
>
>Everyhing is feasable but not everything is beneficial
>think about it
>
>
>>>>>> good academic results and good personally are
>not mutually exclusive.
>>>>>> one final word, your English is quite ok, keep
>working hard.
>
>
>
>>first of all, i would say i dont mean to be offensive
>>to "ml"but i have to point out the current situation
>>in hong kong, the secondary skul's circle
>>
>>as a matter of fact, most of the band one skuls in
>>hong kong are having depression on their student's
>>quality, as well as the academic result, but not only
>>SFXC.
>>
>>however, have anyone of us ever thought about wt is
>>the freaking reason behind?
>>when i was in form 1, teachers always remind us we
>>were the best form 1 student in term of academic
>>result over the past 1 decade and they kept on
>>reminding us this FACT throughout our skul life until
>>now. when i was in form 3, mr iu said the top 20
>>students in the form that year can score distinctions
>>in ce for at least a number of 4. let's do some simple
>>calculation, according to his prediction, 20X4, we can
>>get at least 80As in CE
>>
>>and brother anthony(the current principal, just in
>>case u dunno him) indicated that the current 5E cls
>>could score at least 100As in CE
>>
>>wt does that mean?
>>
>>it means they are confident in us ad they have
>>provided us the best teachers of different subjects in
>>sfxc throughout the 5 year's skul time(in my
>>perspective and 321 troop us excluded)
>>
>>however, wt did we, the students, do?
>>
>>i should better pick myself as an example
>>my form ranking decreased by 40 throughout the 5years'
>>time. i dont blame the teachers but myself as i do
>>know the teachers teaching me are already the best
>>that sfxc can offer. the main reason for the
>>decreasing in ranking is all the matter of laziness.
>>
>>i dunno whether my other fellows got poor result becoz
>>of this or wtever. wt i want to emphasis is that,
>>there are nth to deal with the teachers and skul
>>authority but ourselves
>>
>>just bring u an example, in dgs, the skul trains the
>>students to get As in ce or AL from the very beginning
>>in form 1
>>how about in sfxc? we are trained with 自動自覺,
>>自我尊重,自我控制 in form 1 but not 洗腦奪A
>>
>>
>>does ml want all the current and future xaverians to
>>be trained with "洗腦奪A" and leave our traditions
>>somewhere unknown in order to achieve more?
>>
>>
>>Everyhing is feasable but not everything is beneficial
>>think about it
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|
Feedback: 