VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:09:52 02/10/10 Wed
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Angelic Kids

It was a great day. Wins seemed to all be right on. We had fun. How about everyone else?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> Nice pageant. Different opinion on who I had picked for titles, but everyone did a nice job. -- Anonymous, 20:10:03 02/10/10 Wed [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Nice pageant. Different opinion on who I had picked for titles, but everyone did a nice job. -- Anonymous, 19:39:42 02/11/10 Thu [1]

Also a little surprised on title winners but I agree, everyone did a nice job and it was a good day. The girls had fun and that's what matters the most!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Nice pageant. Different opinion on who I had picked for titles, but everyone did a nice job. -- Anonymous, 03:20:01 02/12/10 Fri [1]

Which titles were you suprised by?


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Surprised by the Ultimate. And most of the middle division I would have had in different order. -- Anonymous, 12:19:16 02/12/10 Fri [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Surprised by the Ultimate. And most of the middle division I would have had in different order. -- Anonymous, 12:24:45 02/12/10 Fri [1]

what order would you have expected?


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> I don't really remember who all titled, but I was surprised that Kaylee and Mollie didn't do better. -- Anonymous, 17:58:24 02/12/10 Fri [1]

I think the Ultimate may have been a case of the judges scoring easy on a contestant with only one in her category, not thinking about the overall award.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: I don't really remember who all titled -- Anonymous, 18:53:19 02/12/10 Fri [1]

I agree here. It wasn't right that this pageant was only suppose to go to 13. Yes there was a 14 year old, but she clearly met the 30 day fall back. The girl that won the ultimate was 16 and shouldn't have been allowed to compete.


[ Edit | View ]


[> AK has always let 14 and over compete so 16 is still considered.ok -- Anonymous, 19:49:44 02/12/10 Fri [1]

>It was a great day. Wins seemed to all be right on. We
>had fun. How about everyone else?


[ Edit | View ]


[> [> Re: AK has always let 14 and over compete so 16 is still considered.ok -- Anonymous, 20:05:57 02/12/10 Fri [1]

According to the paperwork for the Michigan pageant, there was a cutoff.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Well that is BS and it should have been on the PW. -- Anonymous, 06:49:37 02/15/10 Mon [1]

The PW CLEARLY states up to 13 years old. Not 16. I guess the 16 year old had to win ultimate because there was no age division for her to win in.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> When will you people learn? You WERE warned! -- Anonymous, 11:50:26 02/15/10 Mon [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Go back and look at ppw It said 14 and up on the online version of the ppw -- Anonymous, 13:53:22 02/15/10 Mon [1]

>>It was a great day. Wins seemed to all be right on. We
>>had fun. How about everyone else?


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Go back and look at ppw It said 14 and up on the online version of the ppw -- Anonymous, 17:35:17 02/15/10 Mon [1]

We also had a really great time!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Go back and look at ppw It said 14 and up on the online version of the ppw -- Anonymous, 13:32:05 02/16/10 Tue [1]

>We also had a really great time!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Go back and look at ppw It said 14 and up on the online version of the ppw -- Anonymous, 22:19:17 02/23/10 Tue [1]

>We also had a really great time!



I see 10-13 division and 7-13 ultimate as highest age groups. But they have always aloud older girls so I assumed it was a typo.


[ Edit | View ]





[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.