VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:02:21 02/24/10 Wed
Author: Anonymous
Subject: I agree completely.
In reply to: 's message, "Re: why??? CI" on 12:31:43 02/24/10 Wed

>I don't think I would have minded if all the girls
>were scored by the same judges on beauty and then
>switch out the judges out for the other two
>categories. It seemed when they were doing overalls
>that some of the younger girls were scored lower
>because they didn't get hardly any of the overalls.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Re: I agree completely. -- Anonymous, 13:34:43 02/24/10 Wed [1]

Some nationals do use different judges, but they have the 0-4 during the morning and 5-up in afternoon with different judges. But they usually dont give 1 overall for the whole pageant. They have enough kids that they give lots of supremes and a overall in just what that age group was for those judges. Im sure it wasnt done on purpose, but something to think about for next time.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: I agree completely. -- Anonymous, 15:38:30 02/24/10 Wed [1]

I'm pretty sure it wasn't done on purpose. But look at this, the afternoon judges judged the photos for the morning kids and the morning judges judged the photos for the afternoon kids. That, I think was very smart because they never saw the kids they judged on stage. Plus, let's not forget that alot of the older girls were marked down on their photos because they had makeup on. So the younger girls did get the advantage there.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> No, not "alot", just a couple. c/i -- Anonymous, 16:14:43 02/24/10 Wed [1]

And girls of all ages were marked down for "retouching", so no one had an advantage.
I think whatever the judging situation, for the most part the winners were right on anyway. There was alot of tough competition.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: No, not "alot", just a couple. c/i -- Anonymous, 17:10:04 02/24/10 Wed [1]

I agree. And the PW clearly stated the photo rules, so it wasn't as much as an advantage as it was just following the rules on the PW.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.