Re: 聯署反對：有關 Use of English - Section E

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

12:48:19 05/01/26 Fri

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: 聯署反對：有關 Use of English - Section E - Task 1

Author:
考生

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:13:51 04/29/07 Sun
In reply to: HAHA 's message, "聯署反對：有關 Use of English - Section E - Task 1" on 02:03:00 04/23/07 Mon

都唔知有咩好嘈

Jeffrey Hui係英皇教補習，呢家反EA反到咁出面，唔洗上過佢堂都估到佢講過：「超字都要拎content分」

marking scheme，話明係markers only，學生睇到已經唔合情理，學生又點會知道上年爆字都照改呢？

task1 2分bonus for唔超500字，同樣係for markers only，你睇到，只能怪自己多事。

記得當日考完practical出試場，聽到最多係以下對話::
超字者::你寫幾多字呀??
冇超字者::400幾
超字者::傻啦!!梗係唔要2分bonus要content!

Jeffrey應該加多一項::
(5) 會使家長、同學對教錯考試方法的英皇教育眾導師失去信心。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: 聯署反對：有關 Use of English - Section E - Task 1
Author: ex考生 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 14:32:56 04/29/07 Sun 想當年UE個proofreading改做淨係打X，我覺得係可以考到考生既應變能力，相比起每年用同日個format好好多，呢d先係考試，如果唔係既話同做exercise有咩分別。每個考生應該熟讀試題要求才作答，此乃最基本的要求!