Re: 仁者見仁 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

19:25:24 05/15/26 Fri

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: 仁者見仁

Author:
蔡俊浩

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:32:17 03/22/07 Thu
In reply to: 陳健成 's message, "仁者見仁" on 10:18:08 03/21/07 Wed

引:
怎樣看待和解讀這些矛盾、什麼是有（沒）價值、又或是在什麼情況或立場下有（沒）價值，就是見仁見智了。

---> 這是價值相對主義, 我認為"價值", 是可以通過思考研究, 找出一合理的答案的.

引:
也許就在於諸子書雖然不是嚴謹的哲學著作，但我們考察諸子的理論又不能跳過它們.
--->在討論某一方法學下, 讀論語的結論時, 既不能跳過論語, 但又不能只引一兩句論語, 正是我面對公仔佬的難處
---> 很多其他著作也比論語嚴謹的.

另外, 為了駁倒對方而故意講一個"stupid version", 其實是不太負責任, 亦沒有令自己的學說變得更聰明的.

在學界, 做的是相反. 先把對方解讀得最合理, 而再指出問題所在, 這方是求真的正確態度

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: 多一點認識
Author: 喜歡思考的 ' 濟民 ' [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 00:01:09 03/25/07 Sun 中國哲學簡史 http://www.ebaomonthly.com/window/liter/philch/philch_cont.htm