what a weekend -- The Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: what a weekend

Author:
hafer

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:18:10 01/19/09 Mon

first things first. sorry to the philly contingent. mcsuck looked like his super bowl self in the first half. throw in receivers who refuse to catch and no real running attack and you get the jesus express in the super bowl. at least you have the phillies.

some comments on the early game. as the sports guy pointed out in his podcast and his column, why didn't the iggles double up on larry fitz? i mean, he's kind of ok. bouldon was playing on one stump and wasn't a real threat and, even if he was, isn't that something you're willing to gamble on? that baffled me. also, why in science didn't the iggles blitz more? the times that they did warner looked like his old concussed self. sit back and he picked the iggles apart. it doesn't make sense to me.

now to the late game. can we all stop hearing about how wonderful flacco is? he's shite (with a uni-brow). pure and simple. just because he looks like he's missing a few chromosomes doesn't mean he should be handled with kids' gloves. end of rant.

other than the above, the stillers did what they had to do to win, namely, don't make too many dumb mistakes and play good d. i am a bit surprised that willie didn't do a bit better running the ball, but i chalk his numbers up to the stabbers doing blow before the game to get hyped up. no other explanation makes sense.

early super bowl prediction: stillers 78 - cards 3

other weekend fun:
1) lots of wii fit
2) lots of fallout 3 (joe, what do you think?)
3) gran torino (great movie)
4) lots of boozing with sniffy yesterday
5) sleep

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]