VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: going for 2


Author:
Heaves
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09:52:14 01/06/09 Tue

That really annoyed me when OSU went for 2 at the 2:00 mark. Did anyone else agree with it? I understand it would have made it a 6 pt (2 field goal) game, but I don't feel like there would been enough time for Texas to pull that off if they had to go that route. Instead it left OSU with an at best chance to tie if Texas scored a TD. I can't wrap my head around this decision. Like it matters.

So Hafer, Fallout 3 is really super good? I'm glad I recommended it to you. Are you playing this now instead of Gears 2?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]



Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.