VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:45:48 07/25/08 Fri
Author: niki
Subject: I read this with trepidation
In reply to: Terry 's message, "Redefining abortion" on 03:14:43 07/24/08 Thu

because I do not support abortion, but I agree with the comments here. WTF?
I think oral contraceptives should be OTC and cheap so that we have no need to use abortion as birth control.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> I'm in this line. -- lynne, 13:24:40 07/25/08 Fri [1]


[ Edit | View ]
[> [> I'm in this line, too! -- Susan, 21:52:08 07/25/08 Fri [1]

I'm anti-abortion. BUT, I am PRO-birth control. Hello? Doesn't take a geenyus to figure out that more birth control should equal less abortions. What the hell are they thinking?


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.