VoyForums

Mon February 18, 2019 20:16:01Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3456789 ]
Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
old boy
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:40:47 09/01/09 Tue
In reply to: 狗神 's message, "Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好" on 23:35:29 08/16/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答
>�
>>�
>>>!
>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前�
>�
>>?>X
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>E
>>>>>�
>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,f
>o
>>r
>>>m
>>>>2
>>>>>,
>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才
>�
>>U
>>>�
>>>>P
>>>>>�
>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>
>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>
>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>30分大晒咩!!
>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>
>nelson教得最好

Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in his lessons.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
Current Boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:51:27 09/04/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人?>?>>�
>>>�
>>>>!
>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前
>�
>>�
>>>?>X
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正?>?>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>E
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,
>f
>>o
>>>r
>>>>m
>>>>>2
>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚?>~
>>�
>>>U
>>>>�
>>>>>P
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>
>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>
>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>
>>nelson教得最好
>
>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>his lessons.


Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on that topic.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Nelson Fung一定是最好的老師,nelson最好


Author:
講手王
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:00:59 09/24/09 Thu

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人
>?>?>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>!
>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之�
>e
>>�
>>>�
>>>>?>X
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正
>?>?>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>E
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1
>,
>>f
>>>o
>>>>r
>>>>>m
>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚
>?>~
>>>�
>>>>U
>>>>>�
>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>>
>>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>>
>>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>>
>>>nelson教得最好
>>
>>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>>his lessons.
>
>
>Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to
>learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on
>that topic.


佢教數教得勁好,生動,又concept勁
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: miss chung著衫有d出位...


Author:
新人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:29:23 11/08/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>>>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的�
>H
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之
>�
>>e
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>?>X
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸�
>�
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>E
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form
>1
>>,
>>>f
>>>>o
>>>>>r
>>>>>>m
>>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清�
>�
>>?>~
>>>>�
>>>>>U
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>>>
>>>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>>>
>>>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>>>
>>>>nelson教得最好
>>>
>>>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>>>his lessons.
>>
>>
>>Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to
>>learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on
>>that topic.
>
>
>佢教數教得勁好,生動,又concept勁


miss chung著衫有d出位...算唔算有問題?


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2017 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.