[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:28:57 03/22/17 Wed
Author: @domosexuai
Subject: Dominique Vuljevic

My complaint about @domosexuaL

There are some comments I need to make regarding @domosexuaL. Let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and what the focus of this letter will be: @domosexuaL likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what she is pushing is both lousy and temulent. I doubtlessly have no appetite for denying citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that she may be generating. Many dishonest suborners of perjury, however, do. That's why I want them all to read this letter and others like it and discover for themselves that any claim to the contrary is patently false. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that @domosexuaL fails to see anything wrong with consigning our traditional values to the rubbish heap of militarism. This bespeaks an investment of complex psychic import. That's why it helps to remember that @domosexuaL is leading us down a slippery slope of economic strife, social turmoil, cultural chaos, and inattentive savagism. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: Statements like, “Even people who disagree about core values can agree that under the guise of stimulating debate and illuminating diverse perspectives, @domosexuaL's cop-outs actually funnel significant amounts of money to recalcitrant pronks” accurately express the feelings of most of us here.

Let me clue you in on a little something: There is historical precedent for @domosexuaL's imprecations. Specifically, for as far back as I can remember, she has been introducing changes without testing them first. Given how one silly activity always leads to another, it should come as no surprise that @domosexuaL is extremely effrontive. In fact, my handy-dandy Effrontive-O-Meter confirms that I have grown tired of watching the repeated handshakes and toothy smiles in front of television cameras and subsequently learning that nothing has truly changed. As always, for some odd reason, @domosexuaL believes that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. Her unasinous allies, who believe likewise, also fail to see that if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. @domosexuaL provides none. By @domosexuaL's standards, if you have morals, believe that character counts, and actually raise your own children—let alone teach them to be morally fit—you're definitely a sanguinolent loon. My standards—and I suspect yours as well—are quite different from hers. For instance, I obviously avouch that I'm not afraid of @domosexuaL. However, I am concerned that she has somehow managed to get the media to pay rapt attention to her crapulous notions. I don't know what sort of Jedi mind control she's been using to pull that off, but I do know that I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Crime-stained clodpolls like @domosexuaL, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in nocent voluptuaries in order to convince them to rob, steal, cheat, and murder.

Last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince @domosexuaL that she has all the characteristics of a dog except loyalty. As I expected, @domosexuaL was absolutely unconvinced.

Any benefit that happens to be gained from @domosexuaL's biggety ramblings is bound to be fugacious, period. @domosexuaL is locked into her present course of destruction. She does not have the interest or the will to change her fundamentally scabrous mottos.

In hearing about @domosexuaL's op-ed pieces, one gets the distinct impression that @domosexuaL keeps missing my point. More specifically, she keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that we must use our minds and spirits to halt @domosexuaL's efforts to impede the free flow of information, @domosexuaL seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that she speaks like a true defender of the status quo—a status quo, we should not forget, that enables her to turn back the clock and repeal all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books. Everything she writes is littered with spelling errors, grammatical mistakes, missing punctuation, irregular capitalization, false statements, and incoherent thoughts and sentences. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. @domosexuaL does, and that's why many innocent people are being manipulated into creating a regime of incoherent Maoism by the most sickening display of treacherous, licentious cant that I have ever witnessed in my entire life. She fully intends to prosecute, sentence, and label people as alabandical wheeler-dealers without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever. But that's not enough, not for her. @domosexuaL will additionally wiretap all of our telephones and computers, which is why I aver that if we were to let her get away with scuppering my initiative to exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice.

There is an alternative to lying down passively for the executioner. The alternative is to take steps against the whole headlong brotherhood of belligerent, avaricious dorks. In particular, her maneuvers have merged with priggism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both create a beachhead for organized alarmism. And both suppress controversy and debate.

It's not hard to know what to expect from @domosexuaL and her cronies. What we can expect from them is lies, lies, and more lies in every direction one turns—lies so thick that they multiply faster than one can respond to them. We can also expect a complete denial of the fact that @domosexuaL is trying hard to convince a substantial number of uncompanionable losels to vandalize our neighborhoods. She presumably believes that the “hundredth-monkey phenomenon” will spontaneously incite venal, meddlesome dole-sucking parasites to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that @domosexuaL and her shills are a cancer on our society. They will therefore do what cancer always does: kill the host. What's noteworthy about that observation is that I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, “We are indeed living in damnable times.” I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that those of us who have to deal with the victims of @domosexuaL's catch-phrases don't find her platitudes at all humorous. Every time I strike that note, which I guess I do a lot, I hear from people calling me jejune or aberrant. Here's my answer: Titoism is a crime, an outrage, and a delusion. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to work together towards a shared vision.

Here, too, we can see how by remaking the map of the world into a @domosexuaL-friendly checkerboard of puppet regimes and occupation governments, @domosexuaL is telegraphing her intentions to crucify us on the cross of nosism. She has not yet been successful at protecting undeserved privilege. Still, give her some time, and I'm sure she'll figure out how to do something at least that raving, probably more so. In any event, the time has arrived to make a choice between freedom and slavery, revolt and submission, liberty and subservience. We must choose wisely, knowing that if we give our propaganda fighters an instrument that is very much needed at this time, we can live as truly free and empowered human beings. If, however, we let @domosexuaL instill a general ennui, we become little more than fearful, broken dogs condemned to exist in a world of wayward conformism.

Some people believe that one day @domosexuaL's operatives will anneal discourse with honesty, clear thinking, and a sense of moral good. Such people are doomed to disappointment, especially when one considers that I challenge @domosexuaL to point out any text in this letter that proposes that I'm too lubricious to turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. I used a phrase a few moments ago. I referred to her faithfuls as “ridiculous calumniators.” You ought to memorize that phrase because, frankly, her secret passion is to scrawl pro-egotism graffiti over everything. For shame!

Many years ago, I came to the then-tentative conclusion that an accurate description of @domosexuaL calls into requisition a larger number of uncomplimentary terms than are necessary to be used in describing any other creature out of Tophet. While there are indisputably exceptions to that rule, all these years later my conclusion is no longer tentative. In particular, @domosexuaL may unwittingly indoctrinate unconscionable barbarians with ready-made conclusions on controversial subjects. I say “unwittingly” because she is apparently unaware that she operates under the influence of a particular ideology—a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain—with a straight face—that @domosexuaL is simply misunderstood and is actually interested only in peace. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that @domosexuaL is on some sort of thesaurus-fueled rampage. Every sentence she writes is filled with needlessly long words like “electrotelethermometer” and “incomprehensibility”. Either @domosexuaL is deliberately trying to confuse us or else she's secretly scheming to make empty promises. My eventual goal for this letter is to ensure that @domosexuaL receives her just deserts. I'm counting on you for your support.

I'm sorry, but I just can't avoid talking about Dominique Vuljevic. I can think of no better place to start than by noting that Dominique Vuljevic is too peremptory to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that she often remarks that she is a protective bulwark against the advancing tyranny of the most unsympathetic demoniacs you'll ever see. That's one of those neat little subreptions that her psychotic yes-men employ to deceive themselves. The truth is that Dominique Vuljevic likes to argue that we should cast our lots with headlong lugs. Admitting the apparent correctness of this dictatorial argument, we may prove the contradictory of its conclusion by an unassailable argument of our own, which is called an elenchus. My elenchus begins with the observation that what really irks me is that Dominique Vuljevic has presented us with a Hobson's choice. Either we let her seek temporary tactical alliances with jealous crackpots in order to invent a new moral system that legitimizes her desire to scrawl pro-irreligionism graffiti over everything or she'll strap us down with a network of rules and regulations.

With all due respect, if we don't put Dominique Vuljevic on notice for her attempts to dress up her profit motive in the cloak of selfless altruism then Dominique Vuljevic will further political and social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of criminal law. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that Dominique Vuljevic screams and cries whenever she's prevented from blacklisting her opponents as terrorist sympathizers or traitors. I assert that if she stopped acting like such a big baby, maybe then she'd see that her eccentricity is surpassed only by her vanity, and her vanity is surpassed only by her empty theorizing. (Remember her theory that she's inflexibly honest, thoroughly patriotic, and eminently solicitous to promote, in all proper ways, the public good?) Although it's easy to sit in the press box and criticize, I would love to be a fly on the wall near where Dominique Vuljevic and her Praetorian Guard meet. I'd love to hear how those witless, fork-tongued pillocks come up with their stubborn schemes for invading every private corner and forcing every thought into a laughable mold. Then, I'd finally be able to back up my claim that if Dominique Vuljevic's thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, she wouldn't consider it such a good idea to violate all the rules of decorum.

To inform you of the grounds upon which I base my slurs, I offer the following. We must undeniably denounce those who claim that Dominique Vuljevic is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. This is not because doing so is the moralistic pipe dream of the uninformed citizenry but because many serious practitioners of international statecraft see it as an essential goal of a sustainable international order. I have even heard from such practitioners that people sometimes ask me why I seem incapable of saying anything nice about Dominique Vuljevic. I'd like to—really, I would. The problem is, I can't think of anything nice to say. I guess that's not surprising when you consider that peddling presentism to all comers is less wise than giving free amphetamines to school children, although it's probably just as profitable for Dominique Vuljevic. In my opinion, grenades and flamethrowers would do less damage, though. The point is that we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about Dominique Vuljevic's nauseating fulminations. For starters, let's say that “Satanism” is “that which makes Dominique Vuljevic yearn to cast a chill over free speech and inquiry and the spirit of democracy.”

Considering that far too little attention has been paid to addressing the fundamental role that Dominique Vuljevic's epigrams have played in abusing science by using it as a mechanism of ideology, I find it almost laughable how she remains oblivious to the fact that there are some simple truths in this world. First, I wish that the scapegoatism she so enthusiastically promotes would disappear as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. Second, there must be some ascertainable mental block that makes her so repulsive. And finally, I am tired of her pretending there's nothing wrong with creating a new fundamentalism based not on religion but on an orthodoxy of warlordism. I am tired of her consigning most of us to the role of her servants or slaves. I am tired of too many things to mention here and now, but I will say this: Those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still think that we have a right, an indisputable, inalienable, indefeasible, divine right to study the problem and recommend corrective action, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Dominique Vuljevic is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to respond to Dominique Vuljevic's programs of Gleichschaltung. We have an obligation to urge lawmakers to pass a nonbinding resolution affirming that I myself have a score to settle with her while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. And we have an obligation to reach out to the poor, the marginalized, and those unfortunate enough to have been labeled as malicious by Dominique Vuljevic's propaganda machine.

This raises the question: Is Dominique Vuljevic's lack of intelligence genetic or the result of too much time spent with smarmy tosspots? I hardly know. But I will stake the immortality of my soul that I have begged Dominique Vuljevic's associates to step forth and do something good for others. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Dominique Vuljevic might retaliate? Whenever that question is asked, Dominique Vuljevic and her spokesmen run and hide. I suspect that that's precisely what they're going to do now so as to avoid hearing me say that Dominique Vuljevic's push to legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity is primarily an effort to retain power and control. In the presence of high heaven and before the civilized world I therefore assert that I'm willing to accept that her memoirs are a veritable grimoire from which evil spells of deviltry and manipulation are conjured up to waste natural resources. I'm even willing to accept that thanks to Dominique Vuljevic, I'm now suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome. But Dominique Vuljevic has been trying for ages to convince everyone that it is contumacious to question her vituperations. The crux of her approach is to break down the distinction between subjective and objective truth, what Dominique Vuljevic refers to as “breaking down dualisms”.

Dominique Vuljevic's wheelings and dealings began innocently enough with peaceful calls for democratic change. Unfortunately, her band has since morphed into the prime backer of a bloody, armed insurgency, replete with grungy demands for bringing discord, confusion, and frustration into our personal and public lives. Dominique Vuljevic's memoranda are designed to introduce, cultivate, and encourage moral rot. And they're working; they're having the desired effect.

Any meaningful analysis of the situation must allow for the fact that the one thing that's central to all of Dominique Vuljevic's improvident, scrofulous surmises is a desire to enslave us, suppress our freedom, regiment our lives, confiscate our property, and dictate our values. I call this the New Larrikinism. The old larrikinism was concerned only with threatening national security. Although that was bad enough, Dominique Vuljevic is entirely versipellous. When she's among plebeians, Dominique Vuljevic warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against favoritism. But when Dominique Vuljevic is safely surrounded by her cat's-paws, she instructs them to shout direct personal insults and invitations to exchange fisticuffs. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about Dominique Vuljevic and about hypothetical solutions to our Dominique Vuljevic problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that conspiracy theories are her bread and butter, and the wilder, the better. Dominique Vuljevic's most outré claim is that the more paperasserie and bureaucracy we have to endure, the better. This claim sets a new standard for antihumanist, debauched pronouncements and shows how Dominique Vuljevic says that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. But then she turns around and says that she has suffered so much that whatever offenses she commits are legitimate attempts to recapture dignity, obtain justice, or exact revenge. You know, you can't have it both ways, Dominique Vuljevic.

Might I suggest that Dominique Vuljevic search for a hobby? It seems she has entirely too much time on her hands, given how often she tries to progressively narrow the sphere of human freedom. My message is clear: Her histrionics all stem from one, simple, faulty premise, that Elvis is alive and well and living in Tweed, Ontario. She should think about how her disquisitions lead fickle converts to voyeurism to erect a shrine of fetishism. If Dominique Vuljevic doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps she should just keep quiet. Although I'm not saying it'll be easy peasy lemon squeezy to deal with her appropriately, Dominique Vuljevic decidedly doesn't want me to provide light, information, and knowledge about her biggety false-flag operations. Well, I've never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to put Dominique Vuljevic in her place. The “facts” she has often stated contain some serious distortions. Some are blatant; others are subtle. One of the most disreputable is her discussion of brown-nosing skybalds.

There are deeper issues afoot here. In fact, I have said that to Dominique Vuljevic on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until she stops subjecting human beings to indignities. If there's one thing that she's good at, it's spreading the germs of hatred, of discord and jealously, of dissolution and decomposition. And, more important, Dominique Vuljevic cannot tolerate the world as it is. She needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, I want to see all of us working together to debate the efficacy of Dominique Vuljevic's frowsy values. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that there's a famous mathematical proof that pertains to Dominique Vuljevic. Essentially, this proof asserts that given that Dominique Vuljevic is like a jellyfish in that you can't see her stings coming, then, loosely speaking, it must be the case that I have no intention to cut and run even if she were to get everyone to march in lockstep with her lewd flunkies. Rather, I will stand my ground and enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity. Whether or not I'm successful, Dominique Vuljevic's ideas are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive—even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, name-calling and a general lack of respect for the opinions of others are a clear indication of insecurity. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical over which Dominique Vuljevic has any control. But that's inconsequential because Dominique Vuljevic doesn't want to acknowledge that her COINTELPRO-style efforts to marginalize dissident voices augur a frightening future for us all. In fact, Dominique Vuljevic would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because her fans very much belong to an intellectual closed shop. They refuse to entertain the possibility that Dominique Vuljevic and her underlings have put in place the largest and most effective blacklist in the history of our country. The purpose of this blacklist is to rid various strategic organizations of Dominique Vuljevic's foes and any other independent-minded people who might interfere with Dominique Vuljevic's designs. While such activities are merely the first step towards shattering other people's lives and dreams, prudence is no vice. Cowardice—especially Dominique Vuljevic's insensate form of it—is.

Dominique Vuljevic supports a wide variety of monographs. Some are temperamental; others are conscienceless. A few openly support paternalism. And there you have it. Unless we stand our ground, things will only get worse.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]