Re: this message thread -- Copake Politics and News

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:34:01 04/21/09 Tue
Author: Cody Hill
Subject:

Re: this message thread
In reply to: 's message, "Re: the issues of substance" on 17:54:36 04/21/09 Tue

"watching this thread.....how far can it go down before it has to go back up? LOL it is running off the right side of the puter screen!"

"A couple more posts and we'll find out. I'm curious too."
Mr. No Name

Looks like the same person replied to his own comment about the supposedly scintillating concern re: the appearence of this discussion thread. That is the reason why I posted the following last Thursday:

"Finally, this thread is starting to run off the page, so it might be a good idea to start a new one very soon."

Since you, apparently, don't know too much about message boards and the auto text wrap method. If you continue to write in the same thread what ends up being nonsensical remarks, it appears as one letter at a time postings in the message subject area on the far right-handed side. Reminds me of a certain someone's political leanings at this location.

That means "it" will never reach a point where it _has_ to go back up again. Therefore, your lack of knowledge in this "important" area is only surpassed by your inability to understand anything to approach sufficient proficiency in a basic subject matter to carry on a legit conversation.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: this message thread -- No name, 19:02:12 04/21/09 Tue
- Re: message thread -- Cody Hill, 12:43:02 04/22/09 Wed
  - Re: message thread -- tsk, 15:22:07 04/22/09 Wed