VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday, July 16, 01:24:51amLogin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]
Subject: hominind evolution


Author:
mredd
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08/30/02 2:49am
In reply to: Karl 's message, "Hominid evolution" on 08/23/02 2:32am

>The question has been over whether the side branches
>were significant. It is interesting that only one
>branch is not extinct - us. But this is not unique -
>there are other animals with no close relatives, just
>as there are languages, like Basque, that don't seem
>to be related to any others.
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>This is probably one for the scientists on our board
>>(Brian, are you out there?), but anyone is welcome to
>>attempt an answer.
>>
>>I get Time magazine, and I just read an article about
>>a new hominid skull they found which they have dated
>>to be around 6 or 7 million years old, making it the
>>oldest one ever discovered. The thing that confused
>>me was that the article indicated that many scientists
>>question whether hominids evolved in a straight line
>>up to humans, and are thinking that perhaps it
>>happened more like a bush (some hominids evolving,
>>then seeing their line die out, and even being in
>>competition with other hominid lines).
>>
>>The thing that confused me about this was... I thought
>>it was already understood that _all_ evolution
>>operated in this bush-like way. Have scientists
>>really thought that hominid evolution could have
>>happened in some straight line without any failed
>>attempts? Overall, I'm really asking if the person
>>who wrote this article knew what he was talking about
>>or not. Has the thinking really been that hominids
>>have evolved in a line, or has this guy just been in
>>the dark on current evolutionary thinking?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ben
Ben,
Good quesiton. While there is plenty of evidence to suggest that that the Neanderthal did exist along side homo sapiens, there is no DNA evidence that would suggest that these genes are present in the mpodern form of humanity that we know today. An unfortunate side line that died out.

Why, only God knows and he's not telling. Perhaps these were the folks of Nod who didn't know Cain. Who were these people who would have not known him? Why the protective mark when all the people on the Earth at that time would have been immediate family. Two Gardens of Eden.

More than likely an allegorical tale not meant to be taken lierally.

Some Christian,huh? One foot in Heaven and one planted in the muck. Kind of like when you see the soul depart the human shell while up to your ankles in blood.

Later,Mredd

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.