Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tuesday, May 13, 02:58:21pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Looking Back... Author: Damoclese [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 02/22/04 9:44pm In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "!" on 02/20/04 10:43am Looking back on this thread, I realize I should have never have pursued this topic this far. (with Wade anyway) In fact, this thread makes me feel sorta schizophrenic or psychotic. (or maybe it's just Wade that makes me feel that way) Anyway, I'd like some other impressions on this particular thread. Does anyone (with the exception of Wade) see Wade's proposed numbering scheme as necessary? To me, it just seems intentionally defined and imposed to bring about a contradiction. It need not be that way as I demonstrated earlier in this thread. (e.g. starting at zero) Barring any outside input, I've pretty much said all that I feel needs to be said to resolve this particular issue. Any comments or suggestions (except from Wade) are welcome. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Some clarifications. Wade A. Tisthammer 02/27/04 1:54pm Answer -- Damoclese, 02/27/04 3:28pm Infinity began? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 02/27/04 10:45pm Infinity squared -- Damoclese, 02/28/04 7:19am oops -- Damoclese, 02/28/04 7:59am Splitting unnecessary hairs. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/ 5/04 11:59am Giggle -- Damoclese, 03/ 5/04 3:34pm My point exactly -- Ben, 03/ 2/04 7:34am And what point would that be? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 03/ 5/04 12:03pm