No thanks. We can discuss it here. -- Ben's Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tuesday, April 29, 10:55:19pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: No thanks. We can discuss it here.

Author:
Ben

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07/ 8/04 12:29am
In reply to: Pastor Jeremy Moorao 's message, "It is not true. Click on the picture to follow the link." on 07/ 7/04 12:03am

Well, I guess it's not too difficult to go around posting a link to another web site on various message boards. On this board, we ask people to prove their points. If you wish to put in a web site you think is helpful to some discussion at some point, that is fine, but not before you have stated your point, whatever it may be.

You say "It is true," but you have made no assertions. You have only asked a question: "Is this your uncle?" So according to what you have said so far, I am to assume that this _is_ my uncle, which would mean it is yours as well. I don't think this represents either the scientific viewpoint or the fundamentalist one on this matter, so perhaps you should explain yourself.

To say that an ape is someone's "uncle" shows either a complete misunderstanding of the evolutionary theory or a purposeful distortion. Either way, it's not too impressive.

Ben

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]