VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sunday, May 11, 02:23:31amLogin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78910 ]
Subject: More math stuff


Author:
Wade A. Tisthammer
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 01/18/04 2:54pm
In reply to: Damoclese 's message, "uh huh" on 01/16/04 8:42pm

>>>
>>>Points by mathematical definition, don't exist.
>>
>>That's not what my math teacher suggested. In math,
>>points exist all the time. For instance, (1, 2) is a
>>point in the equation y = 2x.
>
>Within math, they sorta exist (allbeit in undefined
>ways). In reality, they don't. I'm talking about
>reality here. relevant link

That link doesn't claim that points don't exist in reality.

>>It doesn't mean the point doesn't exist.
>
>No, it can quasi-mathematically exist. In reality, it is meaningless.

On the contrary, it is quite meaningful in the context I am applying it in. What day did he write about last year? This wouldn't even be a point in the sense of having no "thickness," it has a temporal "thickness" of 24 hours. Yesterday is a point in time in that sense, to say that yesterday is meaningless will not help matters.


>>>Therefore, if time is circular, it wouldn't make sense
>>>to have a past or present or future designation.
>>
>>If true, doesn't seem obvious that there is a
>>past? That there was something I did yesterday etc.?
>
>No. It is obvious that I'm perceiving something of the
>subset called time. Past is irrelevant. Future is
>irrelevant.

It's perfectly relevant here. Was there something I did yesterday or not?


>It's all continuous. Where would you make
>a distinction on a circle as to what is "past" Wade?

The point at which the future stops and the past repeats all over again. Again, it seems self-evident that yesterday happened.


>>Actually, a line by definition doesn't have
>>start point or end point (e.g. the line drawn
>>by y = 2x). A segment is what has a start and
>>end point.
>
>I'll concede this. I actually was thinking of a line
>segment when I wrote this.
>
>It does bring up an interesting point about the notion
>of time "lines" however.

Strictly speaking, I think time is a ray, with a beginning point in time.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Less thanDamoclese01/18/04 4:13pm
Misunderstanding timeBen01/18/04 5:06pm


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.