Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, May 12, 02:12:39pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: That's what I'm talking about Author: Damoclese [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 04/ 8/04 7:44am In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "Succinct replies." on 04/ 7/04 11:48pm > >I don't see how that would apply here. Throughout the >infinite past, in each year he writes about a >day. Hence, he writes about an infinite number of >days. There is no possible means for "convergence" >here. Sure there is. There's nothing that says as years run on they don't approach some particular finite number. It's a possibility. Just as them running towards infinity is a possibility. Just as them actually being infinite is a possibility. This is why I see little point in explaining myself to you because when I introduce other possibilities you simply say "nah, I still like mine the best." Even though there is no reason to assume yours is any better. Quite frankly, I think you support pet arguments that only you think you hold the keys to tearing apart. That way, you can always say you are democratically minded because you attempted to tear your own argument apart, and tell everyone else how wrong they are when they find some other way of criticizing the same argument. I guess it's of little surprise, since you spent inordinate amounts of time using symbolic logic on an argument that most of us here could immediately see wasn't necessarily applicable to reality. Oh well. You just keep right on espousing that argument and your own contrived solution. As I said before, I've got better ways of spending my finite time than trying to show an Ox other possibilities he refuses to admit are there. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Really? Wade A. Tisthammer 04/ 8/04 10:07am Watch this -- Damoclese, 04/ 8/04 10:29am I'm watching. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/11/04 9:38pm and oh yeah -- damoclese, 04/ 8/04 10:51am Oh yeah! Kool Aid for everyone! -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/11/04 9:48pm Assuming -- Damoclese, 04/12/04 8:25am Infinity. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/12/04 10:25am heh -- Damoclese, 04/12/04 11:14am Tee hee. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/12/04 4:47pm "one" -- Damoclese, 04/12/04 6:56pm Two -- Wade A. Tishtammer, 04/14/04 1:06pm What's good for the goose -- Damoclese, 04/14/04 5:04pm What other alternatives are there? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/15/04 11:37am Ganders -- Damoclese, 04/15/04 5:36pm Why abandon logic? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/28/04 12:14pm Hiatus over -- Damoclese, 04/28/04 6:53pm Illogical to abandon logic. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/29/04 12:47pm what a bounty -- Damoclese, 04/29/04 2:25pm Of logic. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 05/ 2/04 3:11pm of intuition -- Damoclese, 05/ 4/04 10:51am Of more logic. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 05/ 7/04 2:25pm One mistake... -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 04/15/04 11:40am