| Subject: The Moors |
Author:
Equinox
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 08/24/03 8:42pm
In reply to:
Damoclese
's message, "Mr. Reverse Discrimination" on 02/ 7/02 8:11am
>
>I'd agree with your point that black people have
>contributed to history. In some accounts, it looks
>possible that negros may have discovered america long
>before Columbus ever set foot there.
Thats right, and when the white colonialists got there they massacred almost all of the natives there. The same happened in australia, thats why you never see any aborigine's popping in for a cuppa in neighbors.
>What I don't agree with is your assertion that you
>contributed the only "real contributions". Had the
>african tribes been better prepared militarily, it is
>doubtful that they would have be taken as slaves.
>Further, the Moors had they had better knowledge of
>military tactics, might not have been run out by
>Charles the Hammer. Histories in India, and China and
>North America stretch back as far as 70,000 BCE, each
>with societies that were pretty developed with perhaps
>the exception of military might. These people were not
>black, and certainly they contributed to history.
The "black" or zulu way of war was unbarbaric, their tactics were to scare away attackers with as little bloodshed as possible. When the slavers attacked, the zulu's did the same and the whites shot them down in droves, after which the zulu's gave them land, as was the tradition as a mark of respect, as a symbol of peace. They helped the injured whites and then the slavers basically stabbed them in the back. This is the barbarity akin to that the vikings showed (raping, pillaging and killing)
>You'd do well to leave the propaganda out of your
>statements, and stick only to the facts.
>
>Damoclese
You're right of course, and I agree with many of your (contraversial) concepts.
Equinox
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 