Author:
lots to think about
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 20:57:32 11/10/11 Thu
In reply to:
Kushchak
's message, "I want that job" on 15:10:02 05/13/10 Thu
>I want that job! Work 2 hours, get paid for 40
>
>Well, my other post was deleted. The rats don't like
>that bright light of truth highlighting their severe
>imperfections. In the real world, anybody who
>'performs' like a majority of Metlakatlans, would be
>fired immediately! Ah, the safe bosom of Met,
>allowing the weak to gain 'power' and then do nothing
>but rest on their weak laurels. With people going to
>college, but not finishing, but still have the nerve
>to claim that they are college educated, and by God,
>they deserve that job, is it any wonder that Met is
>floundering on its deathbed. In the real world a
>diploma and a degree count not 'just going to school'.
> Oh, that's another thing: going to school. To the
>wandering fools, that is just another place to drink
>and get into trouble, and come back home with their
>tails tucked. But then they are rewarded...what? Are
>we to reward stupidity? Let's go ahead and perpetuate
>that idiocy. If a dog does something wrong, we
>reprimand it, but also reward it when it does well.
>We treat our 'people' worse than dogs. Insane.
>
>Higher education comes hand in hand with a modicum of
>professionalism. It's intrinsic and almost impossible
>to rid yourself of this professional level once you've
>achieved a higher education, unless you are an addict
>or alcoholic, then those things are mere burdens to
>drink/drug over. In Met, the level of
>'professionalism' stops at family. Those who are in
>charge or have a fine filigree of tenuous 'power' are
>swayed not by detached professionalism, but grotesque
>emotionalism. They would make a 'job' decision based
>solely on how they were treated by that person with
>whom they are dealing. Or, they hold prejudices from
>many years past, and now have the chance 'to get that
>person back' for some insanely perceived wrong that
>was done to them! But when family wants something,
>they bend over backward to give it to them, IN the
>professional field: Nepotism. The weak minds have a
>very difficult time separating personal from work.
>
>Those same weak minds sit idly by and watch others do
>bad things, like work only a couple hours a day and
>get paid for a full day. Their mindset is this: if
>they do it, I can do it. Met is a union! But in the
>real world, union workers actually get the job done
>and do a good job, but it takes a little bit of time.
>They're trained to not work as fast as those next to
>them. How long before Met starts to work? Look at
>that joke of a road that has marred the landscape. A
>very dangerous road! Why? The slackers lined their
>pockets instead of leveling it out. In the real
>world, a road like that would not have been made to
>its current point and been called 'complete'. And Ket
>isn't the real world, but they at least know how to
>make a different by pass road. It's paved and used
>all the time. Didn't take 20 years...oh wait, it's
>not 20 years yet. And why not treat the sides of the
>road with living mulch so that grasses or something
>other than alders grows on the white scars of the
>roadside. If we wait 30 years, then maybe some alders
>will grow...a 'new' road is a typical analogy for Met
>and its corrupt greedy leaders: Takes forever to
>complete and they claw and scratch for the 'credit'
>for doing the 'new' road. By any other standard that
>road isn't new because it's not done yet. The world's
>oldest 'new' road ever! What a joke. Puts the term
>'milking it' to shame. That milk has since curdled
>and has blown away as dust in the wind.
How many jobs are JOBS here because of grants?
When the mill/cannery/and fish traps up and running, where did the money go? and now the casino???????
all we got back in the day was a rope on a soap and same old oranges. NO excuse for the same experience people running! Met didn't benefit from NOTHING!
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
Feedback: 
Re: hmmmm