Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ] |
| Subject: Re: Arthurs Will | |
|
Author: Seoc Colla (possibly) |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 04:54:59 06/21/11 Tue In reply to: itsmeagain 's message, "Re: Arthurs Will" on 02:09:07 06/21/11 Tue 'God made man in his own image or vice versa' So theologians claim, but never supply evidence in support of it. Didn't Arthur establish that 'gods' are human constructs? This thread raises deep questions and offers scope for great knowledge: If Arthur is correct, then Edna Hardinge could not have 'received' what she claimed (although she sincerely may have believed so) - and Arthur's Principles are the more valid. Silver Birch spoke of 'The Nazarene' never of a Jesus and most certainly not of a Savior Christ, which in turn offers much food for thought, We are never 'corrected' in our views, but must come to realise any discrepancies for ourselves. It wouldn't be evolution if we got anything on a plate and of course, are there any absolutes in any case? Jocks image of an ascending staircase is indeed very apt in many ways - we climb them one at a time as we gain that point in understanding. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| Re: Arthurs Will | Jock | 11:38:49 06/21/11 Tue |
|
||
|
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |