I stand by my previous post concerning ca. 1973-78 Fords and MoPars, not 1971 429 SCJ cars..........and, BTW: even the 2-3 point loss in compression cost less tha one second in the 1/4: all things otherwise equal. :) ps. what kind of fool would I be to post my real name here? Those posters who ARE real cops here; some of them DO have my real name/e mail address...........end of discussion -- copcar dot com's Discussion Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: I stand by my previous post concerning ca. 1973-78 Fords and MoPars, not 1971 429 SCJ cars..........and, BTW: even the 2-3 point loss in compression cost less tha one second in the 1/4: all things otherwise equal. :) ps. what kind of fool would I be to post my real name here? Those posters who ARE real cops here; some of them DO have my real name/e mail address...........end of discussion

Author:
Bearhawke in Az
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:03:56 12/12/02 Thu
In reply to: That's great, Bearhawke! Is that really your name? 's message, "Now let's talk about his car BONE stock, no "lil mods" such as exhausts, ignition, K & N filter, spreadbore carb, or the like! Compare it to a car that weighs & 700 POUNDS LESS!!!!!! and has much more horsepower, which corellates with torque, 11.3:1 compression, SEVERELLY UNDER-RATED by Ford at 370 HP in 1971 as ALL the Mfrs were doing dyno'd at 425 HP. 1/4 mile, 0-60MPH, 0-100, top end, what's say?" on 20:39:20 12/12/02 Thu

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Go Bearhawke!! Mr. Meek and Mild 21:12:49 12/12/02 Thu

TORQUE moves the car NOT horsepower! and the 460 has gobs of torque at a LOWER rpm! (NT) Torque man 21:52:57 12/12/02 Thu

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.