Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: The old law professor is at it again Author: Arthur Miller, Harvard School of Law [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 08:45:07 12/12/02 Thu In reply to: I think if anyone were to even remotely come near one of his cars 's message, "they'd most likely get sprayed with pepper, jacked, and have to go to the nearest medical facility for treatment of canine wounds from the "work dog" that will be located in the rear seat, with opened window. Alongwith all that, all you alledged "painters would be posting bonds for an appearance in court on disorderly conduct, criminal mischeif, and assault charges," on 08:31:08 12/12/02 Thu Apparently now it is permissible to attack someone with pepper spray and a dog if they get too close to a car? And after they're attacked they would be charged with assault? Far fetched to say the least. You'd better check what state you're in first to see if pepper spray is legal for a civilian such as yourself to possess or carry. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date A person always has a right to protect his person and /or property from those stupid enough to attempt to inflict physical harm or damage on a person or property, and the law does not limit or prescibe the means by which to do so. nice to hear from you m Professor Miller. It doesn't matter what "state" that a person is in. 14:39:51 12/12/02 Thu But we thought you were the one who called himself a law professor and attorney, Mr. Bs., jD. (ret). Or did you finally stop using that when the Port Orange Police did a full background check on you? (NT) -- The lies never cease, do they?, 14:48:46 12/12/02 Thu nice to see nothing has changed in 3 years, once an ass#*@!........................... (NT) -- Brandon J, 15:15:48 12/12/02 Thu Well!? How special?.... I seem to remember.... -- Big Man Behind the Keyboard, 18:49:38 12/12/02 Thu as they are all held on public domains and thus would be prohibited from doing so. In fact, certain people, like you have referred to routinely are invited to events, sponsered by official agencies , that you would NOT be invited to! Attendanced by "invitation ONLY" and that means that YOU or any other "undesirable" troublemakers won't be there! ,... ( . )!!! (NT) -- i know of NO national shows that have barred anyone form attending,, 20:02:05 12/12/02 Thu Again, I repeat myself.... -- Big Man Behind the Keyboard, 20:28:08 12/12/02 Thu you're all "BIG MEN BEHIND THE KEYBOARD!" I've met some of you in person, and your meek and mild, and wouldn't/couldn't harm a fly! Of course part of your "sociaopathic " tendencies are to assume a different , more desirable, agressive behaviour here, where you can be that way and remain anonymous! Can you say "sociopath?" (NT) -- that's right!, 20:05:41 12/12/02 Thu Slow day at the mall again? (NT) -- Big Man Behind the Keyboard, 20:22:03 12/12/02 Thu It sounds as though you may have the disposition and lack of intellect to be employed there, however. ......So, IS IT A SLOW DAY AT THE MALL, ( . )? (NT) -- I wouldn't know. I don't go to malls, nevermind working there. They don't much like to pay in the six figures., 07:58:03 12/13/02 Fri Neither does Verizon... -- BMBTKB, 00:41:06 12/14/02 Sat ver....who?????? (NT) -- you don't know what the hell you're talking about!, 10:36:35 12/14/02 Sat Seems to me that YOU don't know what you're talking about! Caught you! -- BMBTKB, 16:59:18 12/14/02 Sat