Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

Subject: Crown Vic fires Author: Bruno [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 01:01:35 10/26/02 Sat In reply to: - 's message, "Dallas officer killed in Crown Vic rear-end crash/fire" on 18:32:44 10/23/02 Wed If anyone can verify that the car did or did not have the modifications please post it. I would like to know as I drive a civilian Crown Vic and was thinking of having the modifications made. There was an accident in NYC last night. It appears that a Caddy SUV traveling in excess of 100MPH struck a cab which burst into flames incinerating the driver. The operator of the SUV somehow was able to leave the scene on foot. The cab was so badly mangled and burnt that I could not be sure what it was from the TV footage but it looked like it was probably a Crown Vic from the grill and door frame. Easily 90% of NYC cabs are Crown Vics- the others are left over Caprices and some test minivans. So much for the problem being related to police service use. Like that was an acceptable excuse anyway. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Fires Dave Arnold 11:20:57 10/26/02 Sat The Answer to the problem McKinnis 12:49:30 10/30/02 Wed Ya Think? -- Slab em, 00:29:08 10/31/02 Thu 02B02 Recall Partsman Ed 00:20:26 10/31/02 Thu Thanks, Ed. -- Bruno, 22:55:46 10/31/02 Thu