Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: They made a statement when all of this started. They basically blamed Robyn and said she wasn’t eligible to compete anyway because she had a DC address at the time (and a PA address) but filed the suit in DC. They also threatened to sue Robyn according to that CBS interview. I’ll see if I can find the link. Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 20:05:50 03/23/26 Mon Author Host/IP: 183-36-111-172.clients.gthost.com/172.111.36.183 In reply to: 's message, "Interestingly, Miss America Cassie Donegan liked a post Victoria made on Instagram about resilency after this verdict came in. Cassie, as an ambassador for the national organization, would do well to stay out of this. The Miss PA Org should be held accountable for not holding this contestant accountable. If this was a workplace, every other contestant she has bullied (who reported it) could sue them for ignoring a hostile workplace by turning the other cheek. At the very, very, VERY least, the organization should have investigated the allegations and made a statement. Instead, silence speaks volumes about what they're willing to tolerate" on 17:56:55 03/23/26 Mon [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Found it! Here’s their response: “The recent claims made by a title holder who withdrew from the competition citing concerns about feeling unsafe around another competitor have been reviewed with great care. The National Office is not able to mediate civil disputes, but we strive to ensure a safe and fair environment for everyone involved. A judge in Washington D.C. ruled that both contestants were eligible to compete. Unfortunately, the contestant who chose to withdraw had not provided any proof of eligibility to the State Organization in Pennsylvania. The national office was copied on all communications regarding this matter, including the extensive efforts made to ensure the safety of the contestant which were communicated to her. We remain dedicated to maintaining the integrity of our competitions and the safety of all contestants.“. Click in for link to full article from back in 2024 No name (183-36-111-172.clients.gthost.com/172.111.36.183) 20:11:39 03/23/26 Mon I wonder if they'll have the courage to change their tune now. Their titleholder's behavior was abhorrent. It would be the perfect opportunity for her or the organization to own it and apologize (NT) -- No name, 09:14:47 03/24/26 Tue (pool-72-74-53-82.bstnma.fios.verizon.net/72.74.53.82)