VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:33:34 06/24/02 Mon
Author: G-san
Subject: Re: camshaft combo
In reply to: jan(denmark) 's message, "camshaft combo" on 19:49:11 06/24/02 Mon

I did 4 cars with the Schrick 284/276 camshafts.
It is really a perfect fit with regard to timing figures, valve lift at TDC etc.(no wilder cams are possible without additional work like machining of the valve pockets in the pistons to create valve to piston clearance at TDC)

Bigger valves are not really needed for a 2.3, it's more something for a 2.5.
We still got with std. valves in a Grp.A 2.3 rally car 280Bhp


Cam article
http://www.qubic.net/~adamp/bmw_performance_cam_test_1.jpg
http://www.qubic.net/~adamp/bmw_performance_cam_test_2.jpg

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.