[ Show ]
[ Shrink ]
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09:11:53 08/11/13 Sun
Author: Joe Rizoli (Truth is on our side)
Author Host/IP: 184.108.40.206
Subject: Holocaust truths vs lies
Some interesting conversations about the holocaust lies.
The people commenting show some great insight to this topic, others propagandaized by the Jewish mindset spout their nonsense.
This guy shows great insight:
Patrick Cloutier • made some great comments about the holocaust lies
"I met two Jews who had been in concentration camps in World War 2, and they told me, much to my surprise, that the Germans treated them just fine. What they don't teach you in school, is that the Nuremburg Trials really were show trials, just like the Soviet variety. Rules of evidence were not observed. That means proof was not required of the prosecution - which means that no one had to provide evidence for 6 million Jewish deaths. It was once claimed that 2 million Jews were killed at Auschwitz. Even if bodies are burned in a crematoria, they leave ashes and bone, so 2 million makes for a big pile of ashes and bone.
It was claimed that 200 people were exterminated per hour - but the camp only had 8 crematoria ovens. Human bodies do not burn like paper - it takes an hour to cremate one body. 200 deaths per hour versus 8 bodies cremated per hour: clearly, the disposal capacity of the camp would have created a bottleneck in any extermination attempt.
Why were the ovens there? By law, victims of typhus had to be cremated, in order to prevent the spread of the disease. Why were the people in the camps dying of typhus? Because the Anglo-American air forces had bombed Germany's rail and road network into ruin. Food could not be delivered to the camps in the last months of the war, those within grew weak from hunger and vulnerable to sicknesses, like typhus.
The Holocaust narrative was produced by Zionist Jews, once it became clear that Germany was going to lose the war. The Zionists saw the Nazis as their best partners in realizing their goal of bringing the Jewish people back to Palestine. Almost no Jew in Europe wanted to emigrate to Palestine: the wealth of the world was in Europe, not some arid and undeveloped patch of real estate inhabited by Arabs. The Nazis were going to resettle the Jews outside of Europe, and this fit perfectly with the Zionist objective to settle Jews in Palestine. If they would not go willingly, resettlement policy would make the decision for them...
When Rommel was defeated in Egypt, it became clear that the German Army would not gain control of Palestine for the Zionists. They understood that the British would retain control and regulate Jewish emigration to Palestine. The Zionists also understood that if they were to realize their dream of a Jewish return to Palestine, that they must control the conversation. The Holocaust libel allowed the Zionists to control post-war political conversations about the so-called "Jewish Question" and many other things besides, in both the West and the Soviet Bloc (although in the USSR, the internationalist Jews of the Communist movement opposed the creation of a Zionist state, partly because they considered Zionism to be just another harmful nationalist movement [desegregation versus segregation].)
The Holocaust narrative was so essential to maintaining the post-war order, that questioning it became illegal. Thus, so-called 'Holocaust denial' is an offense punishable by prison in most European countries. Even the attorneys of such defendants risk going to prison, for defending their clients. In America, so-called 'hate speech' regulations substitute for Holocaust denial statutes, and the threat of losing one's teaching career for academically challenging the Holocaust narrative also squelches discussion of it - today, many schools across America have an annual, siren-wailing Holocaust Remembrance Day, at the instigation of local Jewish organizations, partly for the purpose of indoctrinating youth in this sham, and partly for the purpose of excusing Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. But no educator dares to challenge this, for fear of losing his or her teaching job.
These two links offer more insight into what I discussed above:"
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
[ Contact Forum Admin ]
Forum timezone: GMT-8|
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.