I am SURE she did not say no returners... Let's face it, the returners simply did not earn their spot in the Top 5. -- Miss Arizona Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

Subject: I am SURE she did not say no returners... Let's face it, the returners simply did not earn their spot in the Top 5.
Author: <3	[ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ] Date Posted: 18:23:17 06/27/14 Fri In reply to: not fan of new director 's message, "Do you think it is ok to have the Director tell the judges no returners?" on 10:30:18 06/27/14 Fri [ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Subject: Or we simply Do not agree with that!!
Author: fan [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 15:01:21 06/30/14 Mon

[> [> [> [> Subject: I am still unsure of new directors but I dont think that she would express that she wanted no returners to win. I honestly think that the top 5 girls just stood out more to the judges than the other 5. If it were a completely different panel of judges, those top 5 may not have even been in top 5, it all boils down to the judges. I know we all have out personal opinions, but all this gripping about it is not going to change the outcome. Yes, it is shocking, but the judges saw something in Alexa.

Author:
AZ2014
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:02:21 07/01/14 Tue

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: I'm 100% good with Alexa and had her in my top 5 its the OTHER 4 that totally baffle me!!
Author: sorry...but really??? [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 12:33:25 07/01/14 Tue

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Im sure it does as it does with others. But it was clear that they had more of a lasting impression on the judges in order for them to score higher to get that top 5. We do not know what went on in that interview room.
Author: ... [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 16:03:51 07/01/14 Tue

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: I was surprised too but when you think about it, it's really not that surprising. Haley is beautiful, had a stunning dress and great talent. Lauren just looks like a bombshell on stage. Hannah was consistently good in the whole competition. And Rachael is stellar in everything (except maybe talent).
Author: <3 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 06:56:23 07/02/14 Wed

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: if talent is 35% lauren and Hannah should no way have been top 5 just as Meridieth and Kieren SHOULD have been...they were just as good in ss and gown and HAD talent...there's my disconnect!!!
Author: just off..I know hannah "won" talent that was wierd too... [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 07:07:51 07/02/14 Wed

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: I'd have to disagree. I think Hannah and Lauren were better in swimsuit and evening gown.
Author: <3 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 22:31:13 07/02/14 Wed

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Prelim scores aren't carried over though. The composite score is carried over for finals night, and for whatever reason, the returners might have received a lower composite score
Author: The composite score is 30% on finals night [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 11:42:31 07/03/14 Thu

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Why would they baffle you? They were the top ad sellers which this director has placed an importance on. She is all about MONEY.
Author: MONEY!!! [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 11:20:18 07/08/14 Tue

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Now THIS theory I buy. But wasn't Niemic a top ad seller too?
Author: And Winnefeld wasn't "AZ" enough!!! [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 11:50:45 07/08/14 Tue

[> [> [> [> Subject: I am SURE the new director DID say no returners. I also think the new directors could care less about talent. There was none in that top 5.
Author: scratching head? [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 11:18:01 07/08/14 Tue