VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:46:45 04/26/02 Fri
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Re: EGO! EGO! EGO! and more
In reply to: 's message, "Re: EGO! EGO! EGO! and more" on 12:17:11 11/10/99 Wed

>> I have A LOT of input on
>this
>> subject:
>>
>> > (Aha. What I was saying, is that you cannot compare
>> > man to other animals, because of his free will.
>> >
>>
>> I GREATLY disagree. I think
>> it is all too egotistical to believe we are anything
>> BUT animals.
>>
>> >
>> > > (jack) What I'm saying is that humans, like all
>> > > animals and plants, are a product of nature.
>> >
>> > (Of course.)
>> >
>> > > This planet started out as a big ball of gas,
>> which
>> > > due to the effects of gravity, ended up as a
>rough
>> > > sphere composed of various elements. Then came
>> > > something called evolution, or simply random
>> chance;
>> > > I won't go into the chemistry of it, but we ended
>> up
>> > > with life. First there was plant life, eventually
>> animal
>> > > life. Eventually, nature created apes,
>> which
>> > > evolved into neanderthals and cro-magnons, which
>> further
>> > > evolved into humans.
>> >
>> > (Do you think I don't know this all?)
>> >
>>
>> Yes, thank you very much for
>> the science lesson.
>>
>> >
>> > > Surely, the simple fact that we evolved from
>these
>> > > lower species means that we must share certain
>> traits
>> > > with them.
>> >
>> > (Yes, and we do share a lot with apes. The looks,
>for
>> > example. But only few apes share one thing: The
>free
>> > will I explained. Don't make any comments on this
>> one,
>> > because I'm going to explain it better further to
>> this
>> > post.)
>> >
>>
>> Explain it all you like, but
>> once again, this concept of 'free will' is
>> faulty. What IS your definition? As far as I can
>> tell, 'free will' is just that -- the freedom to do
>> things of your own volition. Animals do this all the
>> time. My cat DECIDES to sleep even if he hasn't done
>> anything exerting to require rest. My cat DECIDES to
>> eat even though he's had plenty of food and hasn't
>> done anything (besides sleep) to burn those
>calories.
>> My cat DECIDES to piss on people when they won't do
>> what he wants them to do (such as play with him or
>> feed him). ALL of these examples are signs (by my
>> definition) of 'free will'.
>>
>> >
>> > > We eat plants and animals, just like other
>> > > animals.
>> >
>> > (Of course.)
>> >
>> > > We protect ourselves from harm, just like
>> > > them. We're just much better at it.
>> >
>> > (Sure we protect ourselves from harm. We protect
>> > ourselves unconsciously, like other animals, when
>we
>> > face a threat. That is called insticts. But, we
>also
>> > protect ourselves consciously (for example,
>> > treaties.). The best protection we may have, is a
>> safe
>> > society, which is something we have been close to,
>> yet
>> > not achieved it. A society where there is no
>crime,
>> > poverty, or other things which lower life. I'll
>> > explain this to you. This is a quote from John
>Rawls
>> > (an american philosophist, in case you don't know):
>> > Imagine, that you would get to a group of people,
>> > people who you don't know anything about (In this
>> > case, we may think [of] this as a society, or the
>> planet
>> > earth). You should soon decide, how you divide your
>> > wealth. Would it be wise to think that you would
>take
>> > it all by yourself? Maybe others have the same
>> > intentions. Therefore, there will be a battle,
>which
>> > will be won by the strongest and the meaniest. This
>> > isn't wise, if you want to protect yourself (like
>all
>> > animals, like man, do.) Therefore, ...there
>> > will be a society treaty, for everyone's
>protection.
>> > We may also think this as a treaty between nations,
>> as
>> > if we wouldn't have treaties like this, I don't
>think
>> > there would be anyone left here alive. U may think
>me
>> > as a cynical person, but I think that, because of
>few
>> > nations (see U.S., ) our great achievments will
>cease
>> > to exist.)
>> >
>>
>> Treaties are as meaningless
>> as the promises they are based upon. A FALSE sense
>of
>> security. There are plenty of countries who have
>> signed treaties banning the production and
>development
>> of chemical and biological weapons. If these
>> countries all practiced what they promised everything
>> would be quite a bit safer for us all, but as most of
>> us are aware, the U.S., Russia (formerly the
>> U.S.S.R.), and a handful of others have still
>> researched and created these 'invisible' weapons of
>> mass destruction. People might think that they
>> wouldn't because they signed a treaty, but they
>have.
>> Treaties are just a way for governments to give their
>> citizens a false sense of security and to
>diplomaticly
>> deal with other countries without having to really do
>> anything or make any REAL concessions.
>>
>> >
>> > > But clearly, there are valid comparisons which
>can
>> be
>> > > made, don't you think?
>> >
>> > ( Of course. But, as you see, non[e] of the animals
>> have
>> > been able to create such a safe society. I'm not
>> > saying that man has created a perfect society, but
>I
>> > think the Nordic Countries are very, very close to
>> it.)
>> >
>>
>> Animals' 'societies'
>> are no less secure than our own. Man's
>> 'security' has allowed him to over-populate,
>> making his future far less secure than many other
>> creatures. Ants are more secure than people --
>> they've been around longer and are less likely to go
>> extinct than man is (even if man's extinction is
>> caused by our own hands -- hell, they'd just eat our
>> dead rotting carcasses). Plus, they don't have all
>> this health care to keep the weak alive draining
>their
>> resources. A chain is only as strong as its weakest
>> link, therefore humanity is only as strong as its
>> weakest member. We spend a lot of time trying to
>help
>> our weak survive -- rarely do they become more than
>> marginally stronger, instead they suck us dry and
>> weaken the whole. By that logic, our
>> 'security' has made us weaker.
>>
>> >
>> > > I mean, we don't think like
>> > > they do, we think much better.
>> >
>>
>> How do you know?
>>
>> >
>> > (Yes, and we also think to protect ourselves. But
>> > since we have a free will, we don't just act by our
>> > instincts, and therefore are able to create
>treaties
>> > which will protect us.)
>> >
>>
>> AH! Back to that
>> 'treaty' fallacy again...
>> {i know that said treaty dosen't make me sleep any
>better at night. i feel that i can protect my self
>but i protect myself using wit(shut up s138)and
>instinct. no treaty or law is going to stop anyone
>but a nato member (and maybe not even them) from
>shooting me or other wise. and i'm not even to sure
>about your free will statment either. DO YOU
>SERIOUSLY THINK THAT OTHER ANIMALS HAVE NO FREEDOM TO
>CHOOSE? sometimes i think most wild animals get to
>choose more of what they do than i do. our lives or
>rationed and regulated to the utmost degree. FREE
>WILL? i don't know.}
>
>> >
>> > > Infinitely better, perhaps, but even the
>> > > "infinitely better" can be compared to the much
>> worse,
>> > > can't it?
>> >
>>
>> 'Infinitely better'?
>> Once again, HOW DO YOU KNOW?
>>
>>
>> >
>> > (I think U got the point already. I think there is
>a
>> > lack of intelligence among many of us (again, see
>> U.S.
>> > and NATO, for example). But we are still able to
>> think
>> > much better, as many of us do.)
>> >
>> > > I know many people who are barely able to support
>> > > themselves, and they have 1/3rd of their
>paychecks
>> > > taken from them in taxes. This is not fair, and
>> > > their lives would be much better if they could
>> keep all
>> > > of what they earn.
>> >
>>
>> I think the first question
>> should be, "Why are THEY barely able to support
>> themselves when so many others in similar situations
>> aren't having anywhere near as many problems?". Yes,
>> the federal bastards swipe a good third of my income
>> (I admit I get a good chunk of it back in the form of
>> tax returns, tho'), but I'm not having TOO hard of a
>> time with it. Let me give you some background: I am
>> married, have a child, and, together with my wife,
>> make less than $32,000 per year (working 40+ hours
>> each -- and neither of us have better than a high
>> school education). We're not homeless, and we don't
>> live on welfare or get food stamps or anything like
>> that (aka making society weaker) -- when we're done
>> paying our bills money's sometimes a little tight,
>but
>> I still have enough left over to support my musical
>> habit (guitar, 8-track digital recorder, high-end
>amp,
>> synth, computer, etc...) so why are these other
>people
>> having such a hard time? Is the rent too high?
>MOVE.
>> Job not pay enough? QUIT. GET ANOTHER. Drugs too
>> expensive? STOP BUYING THEM. IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD
>> THEM, YOU SHOULDN'T BE BUYING THEM. Hobby too
>> expensive? FIND A NEW HOBBY (OR JUST BE MORE
>> PATIENT). Kids too expensive? CONDOMS ARE
>CHEAP(ER).
>> See the point?
>>
>> >{s138 i agree life, sucks buy a fucking helmet.}
>> > (That's a bit over the top. Here in Finland, rich
>> > people pay more taxes than in the U.S. The highiest
>> > taxes are about 60%, and the people who pay them,
>> have
>> > a yearly income in millions. Nobody needs millions
>to
>> > support himself, or his hobbies. Then why should
>they
>> > have it? What work have they done so hard? I think
>> the
>> > ones who own millions should have more taxes, not
>the
>> > ones who barely support themselves.
>> >
>>
>> I think the taxes should be
>> an EQUAL percentage for everyone. The rich will
>still
>> be paying more than the poor in amount but at least
>it
>> is more fair across the board. Why should the rich
>be
>> punished for being rich? How would YOU feel if the
>> tables were turned? Would you say, "Gee, I've got so
>> much cash I don't mind giving most of it away." Or
>> would it be more like: "Why do I have to give up 60%
>> of my money when everyone else doesn't have to give
>up
>> more than 5%?" If the first one is what you would
>> say, you'll forgive me if I don't believe you.
>>
>> {as of this moment of my life i am considered to be
>"below the poverty line" i get raped for taxes. I
>also was really never GIVEN a chance to dig myself out
>of this financial rut
>but i trudge along none the less. i also belive taxes
>should be an even spread across the classes.}
>> >
>> > > (jack) Oh, whatever Think Tank. Man's nature is
>> to
>> > > help the poor, and it's nice that we can rise
>above
>> > > that nature as the Smoking Man has complimented
>you
>> > > on suggesting, because then, I guess, we wouldn't
>> help
>> > > the poor. Or maybe it's the other way around...
>> > > Whatever.
>> >
>>
>> Man's nature isn't to help
>> the poor, it's to help himself. When was the last
>> time YOUR landlord said, "It's too bad you can't
>> afford to pay the rent this month. Don't worry about
>> it, I've got more money than you so one month won't
>> matter to me."? I'll tell you when: NEVER! Only the
>> incredibly rich are willing to take a major loss to
>> help out the less fortunate (and they're just doing
>it
>> for a tax write-off or because they're a little
>> excentric.
>> {NO SHIT}
>> >
>> > (Your argument is controversial. You say that
>people
>> > who barely support theselves, pay too much taxes,
>> > right? By that, they are the poor. Then, you
>> > suggest we should rise above the nature to help the
>> > poor. This is very, very funny.)
>> > {i don't know who you are or who you think
>youy are but yes I pay too may taxes. I barely
>can take care of myself AND I PAY TOO MANY TAXES!!! I
>am sorry if i am coming across harshly but aound here
>the poor get shit on. I don't know where you live but
>it sounds like a nice place you quite obviously have
>not been exposed to nearly as
>much negativity as i have.}
>> > > (jack) Precisely. Don't you think that if
>> something
>> > > can neither be proven nor disproven, that we
>should
>> > > then admit that we don't know?
>> >
>>
>> That's somewhat sensible.
>> BUT we SHOULD admit it could be possible.
>>
>> >
>> > (I was a bit of slippy here. If something cannot be
>> > proven true, than we can assume that it is false.
>> > Right? I mean, I think we have to prove that we
>have
>> a
>> > free will, don't you? And this is proven.)
>> >
>>
>> Your 'True & False' Theory
>is
>> logically wrong. You can prove something is true (or
>> exists) but you can NEVER prove something is false
>(or
>> does not exist). By your logic, the world WAS flat
>> until Columbus proved to Europe that it wasn't.
>(Yes,
>> I know Columbus wasn't believed to be the first
>person
>> to discover the Western Hemisphere, but he WAS the
>> first to return to Europe and PROVE it.) The world
>> was not round (aka RoundWorld = FALSE) before he
>> proved it to be round (RoundWorld = TRUE). Does this
>> make sense?
>> {wonderful observation but wouldn't that mean that
>there is only one truth for every thing what about
>religion slave
>i know that you hate that kind of thing as much as i
>do or at least you don't advocate it?}
>> >
>> > > (jack) A great many animals communicate with
>each
>> > > other.
>> >
>> > (I mean creative languegal >> color="#FF0000"> (probably not as creative as the
>> spelling...) skills. Which
>> > means that one can produce sentences that have
>never
>> been
>> > produced before. I did say this, if you have read
>the
>> > earliest posts of this discussion.)
>> >
>> Yet a third time: HOW DO YOU
>> KNOW? It's VERY egotistical of anyone to think that
>> we are the only intelligent animals on earth just
>> because other animals do not speak our language. Do
>> YOU understand the sounds they make? If not, HOW DO
>> YOU KNOW THEY AREN'T USING THEM IN A CREATIVE
>MANNER?
>> Yes, they repeat many sounds over and over -- maybe
>it
>> is a COMBINATION of the sound & the number of
>> repeats that gives their language structure (not
>> unlike our own, I might add -- How many of our words
>> are made of completely original sounds?)
>> {now i will proceed to rip you a new asshole(exscuse
>my use of crude language) every thing that is possible
>to have been said has already been said probably 100
>times over. the only time there is a new sentance to
>be said is when a new word is developed. then you can
>be langeugal or whatever.
>> >
>> > > Dolphins are said to have a huge vocabulary;
>> > > whales sing to each other, and they apparently
>pass
>> > > information back and forth via the songs. Cats
>> meow
>> > > and dogs bark, and those sounds convey
>> information.
>> > > And a whole lot of other animals too.
>> >
>> > (Of course they communicate, you know I ain't
>stupid.
>> > But only man (and few apes) have a talent of using
>> our
>> > language creatively, adding words to words, and
>> > therefore producing sentences. If it can be proven
>> > that whales can do this, than we may assume that
>they
>> > have a free will apart from their instincts. Cats
>and
>> > dogs can express themselves, but very primitively,
>as
>> > it shows in their primitive behavior. They don't
>have
>> > society treaties, do they?)
>> >
>>
>> After reading that last part
>> it makes me question human intelligence all
>together.
>> 'Producing Sentences' = 'free will'?? Is
>Marijuana
>> legal in Finland?? On top of that close-minded
>> opinon, we also get 'TREATY' thrust in our
>> faces again!! I wish I still believed in fairy
>tales!
>>
>> {preach on}
>> >
>> > > (jack) Well, animals are quite fond of killing
>and
>> > > eating each other. I sort of think that such
>> behavior
>> > > qualifies them as being the ultimate dissidents.
>> >
>> > (No no no, I meant dissidents apart from their
>> > instincts, like how many capitalists or socialists
>or
>> > fascists or peacelovers do you see in the nature?
>> Even
>> > if few apes have a bit of the same talents we have,
>> > they don't have it enough to use it well, like we
>do.
>> > Sadly, very often we ignore the using of these
>skills
>> > (wars, etc.).)
>> >
>>
>> Ever heard of wolves? How
>> about lions? Elephants? Almost all animals exist in
>> their own little 'societies' -- many of them
>communist
>> (in the philosophical sense -- not the USSR/CHINA
>> version of corruption). They hunt with each other,
>> they travel together for protection, etc... and they
>> ALL do their part (or they get left behind to starve
>> and feed something else, be it predator or
>scavenger.)
>>
>> {i really wish that is how humanity operated most of
>the time. I find that weakness is far to tolerated
>most of the time.}
>> >
>> > > Look forward to hearing your response Think Tank,
>> > >
>> > > Sincerely,
>> > >
>> > > Jack (And I'm not that other "Jack" who's posted
>on
>> > > this board recently :)
>>
>> Well, I'm not Think Tank,
>but
>> I hope this puts a different light to a few ideas.
>>
>>
>> -s138
>{reading through this i now realise another reason why
>i find humanity disturbing. i am sorry i anybody has
>been offended by my outbursts but i really don't
>understand egotism what so ever. i don't find the
>human race supirior
>i think that the human race needs one serious REALITY
>CHECK. free will died with the rise of government,
>laws, and TREATIES. -larva

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.