Re: Spanking of teens -- A nice red bottom

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: Spanking of teens

Author:
Brett to Lurker

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:23:18 10/14/25 Tue
In reply to: Lurker to Longtime Lurker 's message, "Re: Spanking of teens" on 16:43:29 10/14/25 Tue

I don't see where "Longtime Lurker" was claiming proof of anything. There was a question about authenticity here, and that was one attempt at an answer. There are links to information gathered from some studies/surveys that you can choose to believe or not, and some impressions gathered from life.

Why are you so hostile? You haven't disproven a thing, or at least provided some study or form of evidence that might be credible to someone with no stake in the argument. All you've got is some ranting about anti-spanker conspiracies, with no proof to support a conclusion about anyone's background, motivations or ideology.

Maybe you assume that some number of completely unverified posts here must not be fantasies. Maybe you want to believe they're all real, which is your right. You do not need even a shred of evidence or compelling theory to back anything up, but that also leaves you with no answer to the question and nothing to argue about.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]