VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:33:22 04/18/02 Thu
Author: WBJ
Subject: Re: So I take that means you believe that the clubs are
In reply to: Don 's message, "Re: So I take that means you believe that the clubs are" on 15:04:24 04/04/02 Thu

Don,

I just took a look at the GolftestUSA site. And yes it is true that the NG clubs faired well. But how were they tested? With CG'ers or NG'ers? It would seem that they could only be propery reviewed by a person that uses a single axis type swing? Also the ratings are base on input from golfers with handicaps that range from 5 to 25. What does a 20+ golfer know about what constitutes a good club? Just a thought. Maybe I wouldn't base a by on these ratings.

WBJ

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.