VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:19:12 02/20/02 Wed
Author: Remington
Subject: Three frames old and about five frames younger
In reply to: Chazman 's message, "Re: Is that your answer to anyone you do not agree with?" on 18:52:34 02/04/02 Mon

It becomes very difficult to label Moe as an arms swinger when his lower body is moving forward five frames ahead of any movement of his arms.

At least not in the context that I have been reading here, i.e., as in STC or as in Croker.

Chaz, I just wanted to make the point that he was moving 3 frames ahead with the body as an older Moe. As you know, I, too, thought Moe was an arms swinger in a previous life.

Remington

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.