VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:57:01 01/20/02 Sun
Author: John F.
Subject: Re: A genuine fake
In reply to: Edward Laskody 's message, "Re: A genuine fake" on 20:13:45 01/19/02 Sat

But, if a scientist who conducted experiments on ANYTHING would present his findings as fact and try to profit from them, they would first have to be reviewed by peers in a scientific journal, have extensive testing done using double blind studies, and accepted as fact by experts in the field. NONE of which was done here. You are expecting everyone to believe these theories as scientific fact based on experiments done only by the one who stands to profit.

On the other hand, I am going to give the Kuykendall toss a try because it looks interesting to me, not because someone claims it is the only scientifically proven optimum way to play the short game. I do try to keep an open mind about things, because ALL of the information on the single axis swing is EMPIRICAL, not scientific. I just want to find what works best for me. So far, with the full swing, Natural Golf works best.

Ed, my arguments are not with JK or LPG, they are with your pompous attitude. I along with many others feel that you are driving more people away from LPG than attracting them to it. What does JK have to say about your replies here? He must be shuddering if he reads them.

John F.

When statements about cold fusion were made,
>the claimant didn't have to "prove" it, his
>experiments already did that. Now it is up to the
>skeptics to go out and see if Kuykendall is telling
>the truth. Thus far no one has discovered otherwise,
>ie, the experiment has been verified over and over
>again. You if anyone should know that Kuykendall has
>many enemies, don't you think that if that statement
>he made was false, they would never let him forget it.
> Sorry, NG is the second best swing now at
>best. That is just the way it is and you have to get
>out of that state of denial that you are in.
> Ed L

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.