VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:29:34 01/21/02 Mon
Author: Ed Laskody
Subject: Re: A genuine fake
In reply to: John F. 's message, "Re: A genuine fake" on 11:57:01 01/20/02 Sun

>But, if a scientist who conducted experiments on
>ANYTHING would present his findings as fact and try to
>profit from them, they would first have to be reviewed
>by peers in a scientific journal, have extensive
>testing done using double blind studies, and accepted
>as fact by experts in the field. NONE of which was
>done here. You are expecting everyone to believe
>these theories as scientific fact based on experiments
>done only by the one who stands to profit.
>
>On the other hand, I am going to give the Kuykendall
>toss a try because it looks interesting to me, not
>because someone claims it is the only scientifically
>proven optimum way to play the short game. I do try to
>keep an open mind about things, because ALL of the
>information on the single axis swing is EMPIRICAL, not
>scientific. I just want to find what works best for
>me. So far, with the full swing, Natural Golf works
>best.
>
>Ed, my arguments are not with JK or LPG, they are with
>your pompous attitude. I along with many others feel
>that you are driving more people away from LPG than
>attracting them to it. What does JK have to say about
>your replies here? He must be shuddering if he reads
>them.
>
>John F.
>
> When statements about cold fusion were made,
>>the claimant didn't have to "prove" it, his
>>experiments already did that. Now it is up to the
>>skeptics to go out and see if Kuykendall is telling
>>the truth. Thus far no one has discovered otherwise,
>>ie, the experiment has been verified over and over
>>again. You if anyone should know that Kuykendall has
>>many enemies, don't you think that if that statement
>>he made was false, they would never let him forget it.
>> Sorry, NG is the second best swing now at
>>best. That is just the way it is and you have to get
>>out of that state of denial that you are in.
>> Ed L
Kuykendall made a claim that either can be refuted or not. It's very easy to refute! Just get a bunch of good golfers to swing this way and show that this method does not produce superior results.
I think you will agree that there are a lot of people who would love to see him discredited including all the major golf magazines. Certainly they have the resources and will to do it. Why haven't they done it. If Rick Smith made
ssome kind of similar claim for traditional golf it would be banner headlines.
The reason they don't discredit him is obviously because they can"t. Therefore since the claim can't be refuted and I have seen through my and others experiences that it does exactly what it claims to do, I have to accept it as being true.
Also, I really do not like you. Every single post I have made (except one) you have come after me with an I am smarter than you attitude. As long as I get that attitude I
am going to retaliate with that attitude.
Drive people away from single axis, that's a joke right. Have you seen the endorsements for my teaching methods at my web site. My teaching manual entitled the New Fundamnetals is selling and I have about a 5% return on it.
I have also received many letters endorsing it.
Ed Laskody of golfisking.com

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.