Re: Spanking Protocol -- Let's Talk Spanking

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

Subject: Re: Spanking Protocol

Author:
Louise

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:24:58 10/24/25 Fri
In reply to: Helen 's message, "Re: Spanking Protocol" on 18:17:51 10/19/25 Sun

Hi Helen. Thanks for your thoughtful response. Here is my response to you. Do you have personal experience on this matter that you would like to share?

Helen:
The thing I would personally add is shirt is allowed but if I gotta spank you and you're wearing a one piece it's still coming off.

Louise: I can agree with that.

Helen: I would also add a quick sentence to allow for frontal cornertime in very major serious offenses, which would require turning around to face the room for a brief period time at the very end.

Louise; I can agree with that also. What sort of offenses would merit such a special shaming?

Helen: Also I personally reward full cooperation and submission with foregoing the use of an implement and keeping it a hand spanking. I've always liked the intimacy of open hand on bare bottom spanking, and anyway since the punishment is naturally and extremely shameful there's no need to overdue it when it comes to pain, as the embarrassment is sufficiently effective and honestly longer lasting.

Louise: I largely agree with you, but I would keep the option of an implement. My mother introduced me to the hairbrush when I was about 11. But she used it only for serious offenses.

Helen: Depending on the severity of the offense no I don't care who's watching. I don't really get allowing them to ask for modesty and then privacy, but I would reverse the order and have them ask for privacy then modesty. Not that it really matters, that's just how I personally have experienced those pleas being made. I'm curious what specific scenarios the girl would be allowed to keep her panties or be taken to a private room? Or is the point that she will be told no and there's nothing she can do about it.

Louise: I would agree that privacy would be a first priority if both are an issue. Most spankings however are administered privately so the girl is more concerned with modesty. I can see the parent compromising if the girl offers something in return. Such as offering to take a second spanking to be spared the humiliation of being spanked in front of witnesses. Generally such indulgence will not be granted if that is the prescribed sentence.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]