Name (Registered users only):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Hi Graeme, wow that is pretty good info. Thanks for >sharing. With AI being the new thing, you seem to have >a good idea of how it all works. > >Did you find the AI response to be inline with your >thoughts, including the part about the time you passed >notes about the teacher? Which you actually did, >correct? > >It would be interesting to see how AI would respond if >you asked it why your Dad spanked your bare bottom >with a belt rather than continuing with the spoon. > >Good info and an interesting read and post. > >>I was bored, so I asked AI why my Mum smacked me bare >>bottom with the wooden spoon when I was naughty. >> >> >>It’s a strange thing to look back on, isn't it? The >>wooden spoon became a "classic" household item for >>discipline across New Zealand, Australia, and the UK >>for a few very specific historical and practical >>reasons. >> >>​Here is how that specific tradition came about: >> >>​1. The "Tool of Convenience" >>​Historically, the wooden spoon was the most common >>"implement" simply because it was always within reach. >>​The Kitchen Connection: In the 20th century, the >>kitchen was the "heart of the home" where mothers >>spent a lot of time. If a child misbehaved nearby, the >>spoon was right there on the counter. >>​Durability: Unlike a ruler or a stick, a wooden >>spoon is sturdy, doesn't break easily, and provides a >>very loud "crack" sound, which was part of the >>punishment's psychological effect. >> >>​2. The Influence of "School" Methods >>​Until 1990 in New Zealand, teachers used leather >>straps or canes. Parents often felt they needed >>something similar at home to be "consistent" with >>school. >>​The "Flat" Surface: A wooden spoon or a leather >>strap has a flat surface. Parents believed this was >>"safer" than a stick because it distributed the sting >>across the skin rather than cutting it, though it >>still caused significant pain. >> >>​3. Why the "Bare Bottom"? >>​This is the part that many people, including you, >>found the most upsetting or unnecessary. Historically, >>parents used this for two reasons: >>​The "Sting" Factor: Clothing (especially thick >>denim or trousers) acts as a cushion. Parents who >>wanted the punishment to be "memorable" believed the >>child had to feel the full force of the implement on >>the skin to "learn their lesson." >>​The Element of Shame: Taking a child’s clothes >>down or making them "over the lap" was a way to make >>the child feel small and vulnerable. In the "old >>school" mindset, shame was considered a key part of >>the discipline—the idea was that you would be so >>embarrassed you’d never want to repeat the mistake. >> >>​4. The "Spare the Rod" Culture >>​For a long time, there was a heavy religious and >>social belief (often linked to the phrase "Spare the >>rod, spoil the child") that physical pain was a >>necessary "correction" for a child's soul. >> >>​Gender Bias: As you noticed with your sister, boys >>were historically smacked more often and more harshly. >>There was a cultural idea that boys were "tougher" and >>needed more "breaking" to become disciplined men. >> >>​How things changed in NZ >>​2007 Law Change: New Zealand famously changed the >>law (the "Anti-Smacking Bill") to remove the legal >>defense for "reasonable force." >>​The Shift to "Adulthood": Most parents naturally >>stop physical discipline as their kids grow because >>they realize it’s no longer about "controlling" a >>child, but about respecting a young adult. >> >>Even though the law changed in New Zealand in 2007, >>the "wooden spoon" culture didn't disappear overnight. >>Here are a few reasons why parents like your Mum kept >>doing it, even though the legal "excuse" for it had >>been removed: >> >>​1. "It's How I Was Raised" >>​Most parents who used the wooden spoon or >>bare-bottom smacking were raised that way themselves. >>To them, it wasn't "abuse" or "illegal"—it was just >>discipline. They truly believed that because they >>turned out "okay," the same method would work for >>their kids. It’s a very hard cycle to break. >> >>​2. The Privacy of the Home >>​Even though the law changed, what happens behind >>closed doors is usually private. Unless a child goes >>to the police or a teacher, many parents felt they >>could continue disciplining their kids the "old way" >>without anyone knowing. The "bare bottom" part was >>often a way to make sure the punishment stayed >>private, as it left marks where no one at school would >>see them. >> >>​3. The "Last Resort" Frustration >>​You mentioned you got that punishment for "passing >>notes that weren't nice" about a teacher. Parents >>often feel a lot of pressure to make sure their kids >>are respectful. If she felt you were being "cheeky" or >>"disrespectful," she might have reached for the spoon >>out of a moment of frustration, thinking it was the >>only way to get through to you. >> >>​4. A Misunderstanding of the Law >>​For a few years after 2007, there was a lot of >>confusion in NZ. Many parents thought they were still >>allowed to smack as long as it wasn't "too hard." They >>didn't realize that the "reasonable force" rule had >>been completely taken away.
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.