Name (Registered users only):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>Charles Hamilton II has posted on a blog about using >>Grok to create pics and videos of spankings. Here is a >>summary of some parts of what he said: >> >>"Here are some more examples of the successes (but >>mostly failures) I’ve had working with the >>artificial intelligence (A.I.) platform Grok to create >>images and videos. Readers have asked what >>instructions [prompt] I give Grok. Here’s an >example: >> >>"<em>Create Images for a fictional story set in >>England in the 1960s. It is an elite ‘public’ >>school and in the headmaster’s study a senior male >>pupil aged 18 wearing grey trousers, a white shirt and >>blue tie is stretched over a desk waiting to be caned. >>The headmaster is also in the picture</em> >> >>"Grok is very American and doesn’t understand what a >>school cane is. If you ask for one, it will inevitably >>give you what we English call a walking stick. It is >>much better at producing school paddles (the United >>States weapon of choice in schools). I’ve also >>noticed it prefers to make drawings rather than >>photographs. Grok is inconsistent and sometimes it >>will give you an image and other times, not. If you >>keep trying (maybe by changing a word or two in the >>instruction) it might come up with something. >>Sometimes it will go much further than you asked. Once >>I have an image, only then do I ask Grok to turn it >>into a video. I don’t offer further instructions, >>and I just let Grok have its head. >> >>"One of the frustrations with Grok is that it is >>inconsistent. It has ‘safeguards’ that it will not >>breach. Until, that is, it does so... and often of its >>own accord." >> >>(One safeguard is that Grok doesn't seem to want to >>produce pics of 18 year olds in underwear. But for one >>particular pic, for no apparent reason, Grok drew the >>18 year old being caned in briefs without even being >>asked to. Then, without further instructions, Grok >>turned the pic into what Charles calls "a quite >>disturbing video" - the cane whacks produce what >>appear to be large *splashes* of blood through the >>undies. Like something described by Roald Dahl mixed >>with something out of a low budget horror movie.) >> >>I think Graeme has had more success than Charles in >>persuading AI to produce pics of spanking recipients >>in states of dress appropriate for the punishment. I >>think maybe not using Grok? And also sometimes by >>requesting a pic in swimming trunks. >> >>In some of the videos Grok seems to have given the >>characters American accents, but in one of them the >>teacher giving the caning sounds really like a young >>male Mathematics teacher in the Educating Yorkshire TV >>series. He tells them "that's enough slacking" before >>he starts the caning. >> >>When making videos, Grok suffers even more badly than >>when it's making still pics, from its misunderstanding >>of how a spanking works and how objects (especially >>spanking implements) move through 3D space. So some of >>the cane swats land on the ankles and some on the >>shoulders, some are glancing blows or at the wrong >>angle, and sometimes the trajectory of the cane starts >>or stops in completely the wrong place. >> >>The "school cane looking like a walking stick instead" >>problem is something that I've seen in quite a few >>other pics as well. Actually I think maybe artificial >>intelligence is starting to distort the cultural >>memory of what an actual cane really looks like! (Or >>maybe AI just prefers canes to look like the "thicker >>than permitted by official regulations" ones supplied >>in the 20th century to more than 10,000 schools by >>London-based corporal punishment campaigner Eric >>Wildman.) >> >>Charles has also seen the same issues that posters >>here have had, of it taking very large amounts of time >>and lots of small alterations, to be able to get the >>AI to produce something useful. >> >>I notice that the word "fictional" appears in the >>prompt. Most likely Grok is happier to produce >>spanking pics for a fictional story, than pics showing >>a supposedly real incident. >> >>I can't link to the pics and videos from here, but >>hopefully it will inspire readers here to make their >>own. > >Was there date on that guy's Blog article? > >I am only asking because I'd read that there had been >lawsuits and the like against Grok which meant the >free picture and video generation had been removed. >Around the same time, maybe last month, some were >saying that Supergrok (paid membership) benefits were >becoming hit and miss. > >BTW, I couldn't read the CH2 blog because it required >a (proof of age/18+) sign in which I'm not happy to do >just now. > >A while back there was a link to an alternative AI >picture generating site that didn't seem to require >ID. > >I don't remember the name of it and can't find it >personally but I suppose it may still be visible if >you undertake a detailed search thru this site's >archives.
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.