Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>To answer your first question, Curious, I think there >was a slight decline in bare bottom spankings in the >higher grades! The reasons for this were some concern >about modesty and also the belief that older children >could possibly be reasoned with a little more and or >given alternative punishments such as detention. But >make no mistake, spankings and bare-bottom spankings >continued right up to the highest elementary school >grades. In fact some of the soundest bare bottom >spankings I saw handed out were in the higher grades >where kids who had gotten 'too big for their britches' >were soon put well and truly in their place! These >spankings were often given in the classroom in front >of the other kids. This way these cocky youngsters >were publically humiliated and the younger kids were >made to realise that being a fifth grader does not >exempt you from a public, bare bottom spanking! > >Middle school kids also could find their bare rear >ends on the wrong end of a tanning as well! Though in >my experiences not as much as younger children. > >Regarding your second question, it was usual for the >teacher to take down a kids pants and underpants; lift >up a skirt or dress and pull down panties; herself >(most kindergarten, elementary and middle school >teachers were women). One of the reasons for this was >discretion and modesty! Although many teachers were >not too bothered if the rest of the class, who were >other children anyway, saw the kid about to be >spanked, genitalia. Some did try to preserve the >unfortunate youngsters modesty! They thus waited >until the child was already over their lap before >bearing their buttocks. And when the spanking was >over the items of clothing could be replaced before >the kid was stood back on their feet. Issues about >modesty concerned some teachers but many were not >bothered about it. The other reason why teachers >would bare an offenders bottom themselves is that it >was all part of the ritual of the punishment itself. >It put the teacher in complete control of the >situation and increased their power and authority. >It was also something thay may well have enjoyed! > >Which brings us to your third question; did teachers >enjoy spanking, especially on the bare bottom. I >think undoubtably many of them did. The older middle >aged lady teachers not so much in my opinion! I think >for most of them spanking a bare bottom was purely a >matter of discipline and punishment! The virtues of a >bare bottom spanking was simply it hurt more on the >bare skin and it added extra humiliation to the >punishment itself! The younger teachers, who were >actually certainly in the Fifties, in the minority; I >am not so sure about! I am not saying they all 'got >off' on having 'a cute little chubby butt (whether >male or female) over their lap to >spank' but I cannot but think that some of them >certainly did. For a start many of these younger >teachers were in their twenties and thirties; and >depending on the actual age, would have five, ten, >fifteen years previously had received their own last >spankings off their parents, aunts, uncles, teachers, >etc.... They would have fairly fresh and bitter >memories of this and relish the chance to dish out >some old fashioned discipline themselves! Not all of >them obviously but some for sure. Also, im comparison >to the older teachers some of these younger women >would have had much more sexual libido; something that >might well have made the 'task' of spanking some >'irritating' youngsters bottom - epecially a bare >bottom - a far from disagreeable one! When I received >and saw spankings I am convinced that the younger >female teachers spanked longer and harder than the >older ones; not universally so, but for the most part! > Some even had a semblence of a smirk on their face >when spanking. I suppose also, and this is to some >extent hypothoses, that younger women felt they had to >establish their authority, more than the older, middle >aged teachers! > >I am not claiming all of the above is 'gospel truth'! >Just some theories and ideas based on my own >experiences! Just some 'food for thought'!

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.