Re: modesty training -- new childhood nudity forum.

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ]

Subject: Re: modesty training

Author:
tim99
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 05:08:21 11/04/25 Tue
Author Host/IP: 172.83.159.140
In reply to: spelvin 's message, "modesty training" on 10:14:56 11/03/25 Mon

Of course, Spelvin , I agree with your point that modesty is important for boys, but like many things, although it's said to be important online, reality is different. The reality is that most people don't care about boys' modesty , or rather, they think it's less important than girls' modesty . Sacrificing boys' modesty to protect girls is acceptable.

When I was in fourth grade, our classroom moved to a new floor. The girls on that floor said there weren't many stalls in the girls' restroom. Some girls told the teacher that there were sometimes long lines during breaks, and they often couldn't use the restroom during breaks because of the lines. The teacher didn't hesitate to tell the girls that if they really needed to pee but couldn't go into the girls' restroom, they could use the boys' restroom. She also warned us boys that if a girl had to use a boys' stall, we boys must not try to peek in any way. If any girl reported a boy peeping while she was using the restroom, she would immediately call the boy's parents because this wasn't an academic issue, but a serious moral one. However, the teacher never told the girls not to look at boys' private parts when they entered the boys' restroom. As far as I know, girls who have the opportunity to use the men's restroom will glance at the exposed genitals of the boys urinating in the urinals before going to a stall. Some boys don't think it's a big deal, while others have spoken to teachers about this, but the teachers think they're being ungentlemanly by not wanting girls to use the boy's restroom only for a moment and have scolded them. I think this shows the significant difference in privacy between boys and girls at that time.

This happened more than a decade ago, and perhaps now boys' modesty is indeed valued more. I'm just sharing my experience and perspective from back then.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (Registered users only):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Of course, Spelvin , I agree with your point that >modesty is important for boys, but like many things, >although it's said to be important online, reality is >different. The reality is that most people don't care >about boys' modesty , or rather, they think it's less >important than girls' modesty . Sacrificing boys' >modesty to protect girls is acceptable. > >When I was in fourth grade, our classroom moved to a >new floor. The girls on that floor said there weren't >many stalls in the girls' restroom. Some girls told >the teacher that there were sometimes long lines >during breaks, and they often couldn't use the >restroom during breaks because of the lines. The >teacher didn't hesitate to tell the girls that if they >really needed to pee but couldn't go into the girls' >restroom, they could use the boys' restroom. She also >warned us boys that if a girl had to use a boys' >stall, we boys must not try to peek in any way. If any >girl reported a boy peeping while she was using the >restroom, she would immediately call the boy's parents >because this wasn't an academic issue, but a serious >moral one. However, the teacher never told the girls >not to look at boys' private parts when they entered >the boys' restroom. As far as I know, girls who have >the opportunity to use the men's restroom will glance >at the exposed genitals of the boys urinating in the >urinals before going to a stall. Some boys don't think >it's a big deal, while others have spoken to teachers >about this, but the teachers think they're being >ungentlemanly by not wanting girls to use the boy's >restroom only for a moment and have scolded them. I >think this shows the significant difference in privacy >between boys and girls at that time. > >This happened more than a decade ago, and perhaps now >boys' modesty is indeed valued more. I'm just sharing >my experience and perspective from back then.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.