VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Subject: Re: How were "late bloomer" boys treated?
Author: scamptoo
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted:14:07:16 12/31/25 Wed Author Host/IP: 24.57.206.80 In reply to:
BoopsFish
's message, "How were "late bloomer" boys treated?" on 03:26:39 12/31/25 Wed
>When I was 14-15, my closest friend of the same age (I
>will call him J) was quite small and young looking for
>his age. He was only 62 inches (158 centimeters) tall,
>weighed only slightly over 80 pounds (37 kilograms),
>and had no facial hair. Some people found him cute in
>a positive way, but others teased him for being small
>and looking like a younger child. My other friend (who
>I will call K) asked J if he was jealous of K's larger
>genitals. J replied that he was fine with his being
>"small and disappointing" like the rest of his body.
>
>How were "late bloomer" boys treated in your personal
>experience? Did girls find them cute and gentle, or
>did they face a lot of teasing and bullying?
I was one of those 'late bloomers' that you describe but I never heard anyone say anything about it to me.
Date Posted:02:59:36 01/01/26 Thu Author Host/IP: 45.137.76.10
When I was at school, there was an unwritten but well-understood rule that you *never* looked at or checked out the other boys in the shower. That said I'm sure we all did. It's only natural after all and I know I certainly did. But you could never tease or bully the late bloomers because then you'd be admitting that you looked and then you'd become the subject for torment. So basically nothing ever really happened.
Except, and there is a cautionary tale in this, there was one boy who joined the school when we were around age 12/13. He made the mistake of bragging about how 'well-developed' he was. So of course I made sure I checked out his claims when we were in the showers, and he was still very much a little boy down there. He did come in for some teasing for that, so clearly I was not the only one to examine the evidence!
And just for those who are interested: I was basically Mr. Average in that department. I started developing around age 12 when pretty much half the boys had also started and half the boys were yet to start.
Date Posted:05:01:46 01/01/26 Thu Author Host/IP: 76.195.201.31
I never hear term late bloomer really. I only remember one kid got mustache and bloomed abnormally early. Sadly he did of leukemia so not something I wish for even if unrelated.
Only difference after blooming was to skinnydip in more remote areas with rock out croppings. Often it was just boys and girls would not like these rugged areas. You would see adult women do it and they would see boys do this sometimes.
Feedback: 