Name (Registered users only):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>It seems that the only exceptions when boys tried to >cover their penis with their hand was during the first >time they took part in a swim meet in front of >spectators from when they came out of the locker room >and were overwhelmed by the sight of spectators, >especially girls, and instinctively tried to cover >their penis from their sight. > >But as I said in the other post they soon got used to >it. > >Many said that the worst part was at the beginning of >the meets when the boys teams were lined up all naked >on one side with the girls teams in swimsuits facing >them on the other side. This also seems to have been >the worst time for some boys getting erections since >they had nothing to concentrate on except the girls >teams and the spectators facing them. > >Once the meets started they could concentrate on their >swimming, so it was less of a problem. > > >>I think this would be rare during swim meets because >>any boy would realize that it was no use trying to >>cover his front with his hands because the spectators >>were going to see him exposed anyway during the swim >>meet during which it was not posssible to cover >>himself all the time. >> >>Àlso most boys on the teams were used to the exposure >>and saw no sense in covering up. >> >>The main reasons given for not being allowed to >>covering up with their hands were... >>He was trying to hide something >>Or was touching himself inappropriately in front of >>spectators. >> >>But there was also the bigger question and problem of >>erections during meets in front of spectators which >>was very frowned upon by coaches and some said that >>they were even spanked by their coach in the locker >>room after the meet for a boy letting the coach and >>team down in front of spectators by sporting an >>erection during the meet. >> >> >>>This question came up from time on the blue forum and >>>the yellow forum, but I wanted to hear any comments >on >>>this forum. >>> >>>----By keeping one’s hands by his side, the boy >>>shows that he is not self-conscious. >>> >>>Willy (2020, Voy 223876) wished to demonstrate that >>>“my nudity was no big deal.” >>> >>>Manuel (2022, Voy 206801) was told that “we're not >>>doing anything wrong and if we're not doing anything >>>wrong, then we shouldn't be trying to hide >>anything.” >>> >>>Manuel (2022, Voy 206801) further explained that >“we >>>were not to be ashamed or embarrassed no matter the >>>development we were in. Some were more mature than >>>others, some were slow developers, and then others >>>shaved to make themselves appear younger.” >>> >>>----Appearing uninhibited prevents the girls from >>>feeling embarrassed. >>> >>>Willy (2020, Voy 223876) again. Dim (2020, Voy >223876) >>>recalled such a rule being announced at a Russian >>>summer camp, where the boys’ showers were >supervised >>>by older girl counsellors. >>> >>>I interpret this to mean that the boy is embarrassed, >>>and the girl is therefore embarrassed because she >does >>>not know how to react. >>> >>>----It was “offensive to the girls.” >>> >>>Sean (2021, Voy 206801) suggested this as a >>>possibility. >>>I'm not sure I understand correctly. >>>This could mean that a boy's penis is visually >>>pleasurable to a girl, that a boy cupping his penis >is >>>indifferent to the girl's desire for visual pleasure, >>>and that the boy is therefore indifferent to the >>>girl's needs and desires. >>>Does anyone have a different interpretation: >>> >>>----It “draws more attention to oneself.” >>> >>>Willy (2020, Voy 223876) mentioned this as one of the >>>frequent arguments. Manuel (2022, Voy 206801) was >told >>>that “hiding something brings so much attention the >>>wrong way.” >>> >>>----It showed lack of concentration on swimming. >>> >>>Willy (2020, Voy 223876) also mentioned this as one >of >>>the frequent arguments. >>> >>>sean (2021, Voy 206801) also suggested that “the >>>coach just wanted us to be focusing on our swimming >>>knowing if we were touching ourselves a lot, we >>>wouldn't be focusing on the right things.” This is >a >>>strong possibility, since coaches also objected to >>>erections for the same reason. >>> >>>----It infringed on the girl’s desire to look. >>> >>>ss sean (2022, Voy 206801) suspected that one reason >>>was “so the girls could see your erection without . >>>. . interference. Since most of the rules were >>>determined by females in charge, the coach etc., the >>>rules for not covering was for the benefit of the >>>female spectators.” >>> >>>If I understand Willy (2020, Voy 223876) correctly, >he >>>believes that the girls’ view of the boy >swimmers’ >>>genitals is an inborn right, and any obstruction of >>>that view is an infringement of that right: >>> >>>"When nude, I felt I had left my modesty in my >bedroom >>>with my clothes. I accepted once I stepped out of my >>>bedroom I was on full display to the girls and should >>>not expect to be afforded any modesty. . . To me the >>>most appropriate thing to do was allowed the girls to >>>look. Covering myself seemed to me to be rude and >>>disrespectful to the girls." >>> >>>Any more opinions?
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy >;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.