VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, April 27, 02:33:17amLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]
Subject: Re: Not NIL/Portal Related ?


Author:
Purp 1
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Tuesday, January 20, 07:30:36pm
Author Host/IP: syn-074-070-140-050.res.spectrum.com/74.70.140.50
In reply to: NUSuperfan 's message, "Not NIL/Portal Related ?" on Tuesday, January 20, 05:41:39pm

Other than JAM, we DIDN'T compete with the better MAAC schools. The NYC teams could always beat us when it counted. One coach was able to do that but with a completely different set of rules. How we will compete NOW is just beyond me. And now the school has to collect to basically give it away for whatever reason thy deem in the interests of the player. You can't be told what they have apparently, but teams like SJU have millions available it has been reported.

This is basically the cost of doing business for NU to stay designated as a D-I school. Seriously, this is what public relations means to them other than maybe attracting more males to the school (34%) vs 66$. And even this is not working.

My buddy Hnk is sad (I know) because his Bonnies are still winless in A-10 play, but look what he has to cheer for compared to us. Niagara wants the "appearance" of D-I spending no more than absolutely nesessary to get the product out there. Bona has a guy going out there and collecting millions because it's going to take money to ride with those other horses in the A-10.

Niagara never did anything with their programs with continuity and organization to keep things rollin. And most noticable during CM's years and afterwards.

Nuttin. I was there to witness nuttin.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> Subject: Good Points BUT. . .


Author:
NUSuperfan
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, January 20, 07:53:42pm
Author Host/IP: syn-107-145-011-181.res.spectrum.com/107.145.11.181

In the end none of those so called better MAAC schools have been that good in the last number of years. Iona and Siena have not impressed me at all. In fact, for the most part, they have regressed. Look at the first and second halves of the NU vs MSM and CU vs MSM. MSMs on paper is supposed to be one of the better programs in the MAAC. They have Keys, who's a great shooter along with capable height and length. They play very good defense for a MAAC program. YET, both Niagara and Canisius had sizable leads on them for most of the first half; and in fact, led MSM at the half in both games. In the second half of both games, the script turned around and MSM ended up winning both games. My point ? If NU and CU played as well as they did in the first half of their MSM games, they could have won those games. The talent level and recruiting prowess of each MAAC program is not that much better than any of their counterparts. Any team that makes the Tourney can beat any other team in the MAAC Tournament. We have seen that over the years. Is there a talent difference among the programs year to year? YES, but I don't see that much of a talent gap between the programs. That's why there are so many inter conference "upsets" during the season. Who's gonna win the MAAC this season ? Your guess is as good as mine. Sometimes the so called money rich schools just don't cut it in the MAAC. We have seen that with Siena as an example over the years. In fact, Siena has had a number of bad seasons, in the recent past.
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Good Points BUT. . .


Author:
Purp 1
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, January 20, 07:58:18pm
Author Host/IP: syn-074-070-140-050.res.spectrum.com/74.70.140.50

"If NU and CU played as well as they did in the first half of their MSM games, they could have won those games. "

You know how that goes. "If queens had balls they'd be kings.
That's exactly it. They can't do it for 40 minutes. If they did they would be 3 notches higher.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Good Points BUT. . .


Author:
NUSuperfan
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, January 20, 08:07:38pm
Author Host/IP: syn-107-145-011-181.res.spectrum.com/107.145.11.181

Don't disagree at all, just saying that if the personnel you have can put together 2 good halves in a game, you should be able to win. Just asking the same players to do similarly what they did in the first half. But yes, I know what you mean.


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.